Impact of rapidly cleaving embryos on blastocyst formation and single-blastocyst transfer outcomes
Open Access
- 18 February 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Endocrinology
- Vol. 17, 1745628
Abstract
Background: Clarifying the impact of day-3 cell number on blastulation and subsequent pregnancy outcomes is essential for optimizing blastocyst selection criteria and refining embryo assessment protocols. While slow cleavage on day 3 is well-recognized as detrimental, the prognostic value of rapid cleavage (>8 cells) remains ambiguous. Methods: This retrospective cohort study (January 2015–April 2024) included 64,853 embryos undergoing blastocyst culture (Cohort 1) and 2,669 single-blastocyst frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles (Cohort 2) at a large tertiary assisted reproduction center. Cohort 1 examined the association between day-3 cell number and blastulation potential. Cohort 2 evaluated clinical pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rates following single-blastocyst transfer using multivariable logistic regression adjusted for confounders. Embryos were stratified by maternal age ( 1.4; 95% CIs excluded 1). This pattern was consistent across female age subgroups. In Cohort 2, however, the advantage of 11–16-cell embryos translated into superior pregnancy and live birth rates only in younger women receiving top-quality blastocysts versus 8-cell embryos (76.5% vs . 63.0%, P = 0.002, aOR = 1.95 [1.30–2.96]; 61.2% vs . 51.2%, P = 0.034, aOR = 1.58 [1.10–2.30]). Conversely, in older women with non-top-quality blastocysts, 11–16-cell embryos predicted lower pregnancy and live birth rates (26.5% vs . 51.0%, P = 0.023, aOR = 0.40 [0.15–0.97]; 14.7% vs . 38.5%, P = 0.019, aOR = 0.32 [0.10–0.89]). The 9–10-cell embryos generally showed outcomes comparable to 8-cell embryos, except for a reduced live birth rate in the older, non-top-quality blastocyst subgroup (23.9% vs . 38.5%, P = 0.047, aOR = 0.51 [0.26–0.98]). Conclusion: Day-3 cell number serves as a context-dependent prognostic indicator for optimizing blastocyst selection. For young women with top-quality blastocysts, ≥11-cell embryos are the strongest candidates; conversely, 8-cell embryos appear optimal for older women with non-top-quality blastocysts.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Morphological parameters of the blastocyst to predict embryo quality: a systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2025
- The maternal-to-zygotic transitionCurrent Biology, 2024
- Clinical and laboratory key performance indicators in IVF: A consensus between the Italian Society of Fertility and Sterility and Reproductive Medicine (SIFES-MR) and the Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction and Research (SIERR)Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2023
- Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technologyCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2022
- A novel system based on artificial intelligence for predicting blastocyst viability and visualizing the explanationReproductive Medicine and Biology, 2022
- Clinical outcomes following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfers with blastocysts derived from different cell numbers on day 3: a retrospective cohort studyJournal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2020
- Deconstructing the myth of poor prognosis for fast-cleaving embryos on day 3. Is it time to change the consensus?Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2019
- Mitotic Dysfunction Associated with Aging Hallmarks2017
- Increased blastomere number in cleavage-stage embryos is associated with higher aneuploidyFertility and Sterility, 2015
- Human blastocyst morphological quality is significantly improved in embryos classified as fast on day 3 (≥10 cells), bringing into question current embryological dogmaFertility and Sterility, 2008