Individual differences in moral judgment predict attitudes towards mandatory vaccinations
Authors:
- 17 November 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Personality and Individual Differences
- Vol. 186, 111391
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- University of Toledo
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Polarization and public health: Partisan differences in social distancing during the coronavirus pandemicJournal of Public Economics, 2020
- Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophersCognition, 2018
- Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology.Psychological Review, 2018
- The moral obligation to be vaccinated: utilitarianism, contractualism, and collective easy rescueMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2018
- The 12 Item Social and Economic Conservatism Scale (SECS)PLOS ONE, 2013
- Low Levels of Empathic Concern Predict Utilitarian Moral JudgmentPLOS ONE, 2013
- Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2013
- FAMILY, COMMUNITY, TROLLEY PROBLEMS, AND THE CRISIS IN MORAL PSYCHOLOGYThe Yale Review, 2011
- moral heuristicsBehavioral and Brain Sciences, 2005
- An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral JudgmentScience, 2001