Are There Differences Between Sexes in Performance-Related Variables During a Maximal Intermittent Flywheel Test?
- 24 February 2025
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sports Health: A Multidisciplinary Approach
- Vol. 17 (6) , 1244-1251
Abstract
Background: Isometric and dynamic tasks of low-to-moderate intensities have been used to study sex differences in fatigability; however, maximal exertions with flywheel devices (FDs) have not been used. This study aimed to (1) detect sex differences in fatigue-related performance in a maximal intermittent fatiguing protocol on a FD, and (2) investigate the most sensitive dynamometric and mechanical variables for assessing fatigue in both sexes. Hypothesis: No sex differences should exist when performing this protocol on a FD. Study Design: Cohort observational study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: A total of 34 young adults (17 female/17 male) performed 10 sets of 10 repetitions with 3 minutes of passive recovery of a half-squat exercise on a FD. Inter- and intraset analysis of force, power, velocity, work, and impulse, together with their relative change and slope, were calculated during concentric and eccentric phases. Raw data were also normalized to body mass in the interset analysis. The relative changes in each variable were compared. Results: Men showed greater and earlier decreases in performance throughout sets ( P < .05; η p 2 ≥ 0.08), but these differences were not consistent after normalization for body mass ( P > .05; η p 2 ≤ 0.05). Irrespective of sex and phase, the intraset analysis revealed that relative change was higher in the last set ( P ≤ .03; η p 2 ≥ 0.14), with power being the most sensitive variable for detecting performance decline ( P ≤ .04; η p 2 = 0.49). Conclusion: Women experienced slower and delayed fatigue kinetics than men during a maximal intermittent fatiguing protocol with FD if body dimensionality is not considered. For training purposes, power seems to be the most sensitive and discriminative variable for detecting decreases in performance. Clinical Relevance: Body dimensionality is a key factor that must be considered when comparing both sexes in FDs.Keywords
Funding Information
- Institut Nacional d’Educacio Fisica de Catalunya, Generalitat de Catalunya (PRE133/22/000005)
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- The knowns and unknowns of neural adaptations to resistance trainingEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2020
- Sex differences in neuromuscular function after repeated eccentric contractions of the knee extensor musclesEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2017
- Exercise vasodilation is greater in women: contributions of nitric oxide synthase and cyclooxygenaseEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2015
- Fatigue and recovery from dynamic contractions in men and women differ for arm and leg musclesMuscle & Nerve, 2013
- Mechanical work accounts for sex differences in fatigue during repeated sprintsEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2011
- Flywheel resistance training calls for greater eccentric muscle activation than weight trainingEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2010
- Sex differences in time to task failure and blood flow for an intermittent isometric fatiguing contractionMuscle & Nerve, 2008
- Resistance training using eccentric overload induces early adaptations in skeletal muscle sizeEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2007
- Mechanisms of fatigue differ after low‐ and high‐force fatiguing contractions in men and womenMuscle & Nerve, 2007
- Gender-specific knee extensor torque, flexor torque, and muscle fatigue responses during maximal effort contractionsEuropean Journal of Applied Physiology, 2003