VOTING IN FIRMS: THE ROLE OF AGENDA CONTROL, SIZE AND VOTER HOMOGENEITY
Authors:
- Lee BenhamLBLee Benham
- Philip KeeferPKPhilip Keefer
- 1 October 1991
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Economic Inquiry
- Vol. 29 (4) , 706-719
Abstract
Voting is a common feature of most firms. Unrestricted voting, however, can lead to unstable decision making. We find that firms make tradeoffs among collective decision making, production scale, firm structure, and voter characteristics that are consistent with efforts to economize on the costs of voting. Firm responses include agenda control, restrictions to obtain a homogeneous voting population, and limits on firm size. We consider three long‐surviving producer cooperatives, representing extreme cases of collective decision making, and find that their organization is sensitive to the costs of voting and to the employment of mechanisms to constrain those costs.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Voting in Corporate LawThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- The Illyrian Firm RevisitedThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1983
- The Adjustment Processes of Labour Co-operatives With Constant Returns to Scale and Perfect CompetitionThe Economic Journal, 1979
- Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting ModelsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1979
- Rights and Production Functions: An Application to Labor-Managed Firms and CodeterminationThe Journal of Business, 1979
- Instability of Simple Dynamic GamesReview of Economic Studies, 1978
- Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda controlJournal of Economic Theory, 1976
- Choice, faith, and politics: The political economy of hutterian communesPublic Choice, 1972
- The General Irrelevance of the General Impossibility TheoremThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1967
- Some Theoretical Aspects of Share Voting. An Essay in Honor of Adolf A. BerleColumbia Law Review, 1964