High-Resolution Manometry Studies Are Frequently Imperfect but Usually Still Interpretable
Authors:
- Sabine RomanSRSabine Roman
- Peter J. KahrilasPKPeter J. Kahrilas
- Lubomyr BorisLBLubomyr Boris
- Kiran BidariKBKiran Bidari
- Daniel LugerDLDaniel Luger
- John E. PandolfinoJPJohn E. Pandolfino
- 1 December 2011
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Vol. 9 (12) , 1050-1055
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Esophageal Motor Disorders in Terms of High-Resolution Esophageal Pressure Topography: What Has Changed?American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2010
- High‐resolution manometry in clinical practice: utilizing pressure topography to classify oesophageal motility abnormalitiesNeurogastroenterology & Motility, 2009
- Achalasia: A New Clinically Relevant Classification by High-Resolution ManometryGastroenterology, 2008
- Value of Spatiotemporal Representation of Manometric DataClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2008
- American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: Clinical use of esophageal manometryGastroenterology, 2005
- AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometryGastroenterology, 2005
- High‐resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometryNeurogastroenterology & Motility, 2004
- Components of the standard oesophageal manometryNeurogastroenterology & Motility, 2003
- Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalitiesGut, 2001
- Application of Topographical Methods To Clinical Esophageal ManometryAmerican Journal of Gastroenterology, 2000