Team Dynamics Perceptions, Motivation, and Anxiety in University Athletes
Open Access
- 12 January 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 13 (2) , 648
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the interrelation between team dynamics with motivation types and anxiety factors in university athletes, highlighting the role played by team members’ point of view and coach’s point of view. Participants were 674 university athletes, men (46.4%) and women (53.6%), from different sports, with an age range between 18 and 28 years (M = 21.06; SD = 2.07). Instruments used were Cooperation Workteam Questionnaire (CWQ), the Sports Motivation Scale (SMS-II), and the Sports Anxiety Scale (SAS-2). The model from the team member’s point of view presented adequate fit indices (χ2 (924) = 2690.17, χ2/df = 2.91, CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.05), same as the model from the coach’s point of view (χ2 (924) = 2692.82, χ2/df = 2.99, CFI = 0.90, RMSEA = 0.05). The results obtained in both models show five indirect effects, two of them between team dynamics from both points of view with somatic anxiety and deconcentration, with autonomous motivation as a mediator, and the other three between the team dynamics from both perspectives with somatic anxiety, worry, and deconcentration, having controlled motivation as a mediator.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of the revised sport motivation scale (SMS-II)Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2013
- Competitive anxiety in young athletes: Differentiating somatic anxiety, worry, and concentration disruptionAnxiety, stress, and coping, 2009
- Resampling and Distribution of the Product Methods for Testing Indirect Effects in Complex ModelsStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2008
- Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A ReviewThe Journal of Educational Research, 2006
- An integrative analysis of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in sportJournal of Applied Sport Psychology, 1999
- PERSON‐ORGANIZATION FIT: AN INTEGRATIVE REVIEW OF ITS CONCEPTUALIZATIONS, MEASUREMENT, AND IMPLICATIONSPersonnel Psychology, 1996
- Alternative Ways of Assessing Model FitSociological Methods & Research, 1992
- An overview of structural equation modeling1988
- The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personalityJournal of Research in Personality, 1985
- Cognitive DissonanceScientific American, 1962