Trust relays: multi-mediated procedural justice and deaf British Sign Language users’ experiences of technology in police contact
Open Access
- 5 November 2026
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Policing and Society
- p. 1-17
Abstract
No abstract availableFunding Information
- Economic and Social Research Council (ES/V00283X/1)
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- An Illusion of Inclusion: Charity Workers’ Views on Police Responses to D/deaf Victims of Domestic AbuseJournal of Family Violence, 2025
- ‘Help is on the way’Translation and Interpreting Studies, 2022
- Technology and Police Legitimacy2022
- Signing Deaf Communities and Language Brokering2021
- ‘Sorry, I’m dead, it’s too late now’: barriers faced by D/deaf citizens when accessing police servicesDisability & Society, 2020
- Sign language interpreting servicesTranslation and Interpreting Studies, 2019
- Popular legitimacy and the exercise of legal authority: Motivating compliance, cooperation, and engagement.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2014
- Video Interpreting Services: Calls for Inclusion or Redialling Exclusion?Ethnos, 2012
- Contact and confidence: revisiting the impact of public encounters with the policePolicing and Society, 2009
- Procedural justice and participation in task selection: The role of control in mediating justice judgments.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987