Biopsy Provides Actionable Information Associated with Treatment Decisions for 2–7 cm Renal Masses
Authors:
- Daniel F. RoadmanDRDaniel F. Roadman
- Daniel D. ShapiroDSDaniel D. Shapiro
- Paz LotanPLPaz Lotan
- Tudor BorzaTBTudor Borza
- Isabelle SueJin LeeILIsabelle SueJin Lee
- J. Louis HinshawJHJ. Louis Hinshaw
- Fred T. LeeFLFred T. Lee
- Edwarda GoldenEGEdwarda Golden
- Erica Knavel KoepselEKErica Knavel Koepsel
- Paul LaesekePLPaul Laeseke
- David F. JarrardDJDavid F. Jarrard
- Kyle A. RichardsKRKyle A. Richards
Open Access
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Renal mass biopsy (biopsy) is increasingly incorporated into the evaluation of localized renal masses, yet its role in guiding management remains variable among clinical practices. We evaluated the clinical association of biopsy using a simplified classification system categorizing biopsy results as Biopsy Actionable for Immediate Treatment (BAIT) or Biopsy Actionable for Active Surveillance (BAAS)—assessing how biopsy-derived histology influences real-world management. Methods: We identified all patients undergoing biopsy for a renal mass measuring 2–7 cm at a single academic center between 2010 and 2025. After excluding nondiagnostic biopsies, repeat biopsies, and biopsies performed for metastatic diagnosis, 1395 patients formed the analytic cohort. Histologic subtypes and initial treatment were evaluated. Multivariable logistic regression assessed predictors of (1) radical versus partial nephrectomy, (2) surgery versus thermal ablation, and (3) active surveillance versus intervention, adjusting for tumor diameter, age, and BAIT/BAAS status. Results: Of 1395 patients, 1119 (80.2%) had BAIT pathology and 276 (19.8%) had BAAS pathology. Initial management included surgery (36.3%), thermal ablation (36.3%), active surveillance (24.2%), no treatment (1.7%), and radiation (1.5%). BAAS pathology was strongly associated with the selection of active surveillance (OR 21.80, p < 0.001). Larger tumor diameter was the principal driver of radical nephrectomy (OR 2.04/cm, p < 0.001) and of choosing surgery over ablation (OR 2.05/cm, p < 0.001). Younger age was associated with selection of surgery over ablation (OR 0.93/year, p < 0.001). Biopsy histology showed a stronger association with surveillance selection than either tumor diameter or age. Conclusions: Biopsy provides actionable diagnostic information for patients with 2–7 cm renal masses, identifying benign or indolent pathology in nearly one in five patients. BAIT/BAAS categorization was strongly associated with the selection of active surveillance for renal masses.Keywords
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Renal Mass Biopsy Prior to Surgical Excision: Practice, Diagnostic Performance, and Impact on Management in the UroCCR Registry (Ancillary Study No. 118)European Urology Open Science, 2025
- Role of renal mass biopsy for diagnosis and management: Review of current trends and future directionsCancer Cytopathology, 2023
- Benefit and Harm of Active Surveillance for Biopsy-proven Renal Oncocytoma: A Systematic Review and Pooled AnalysisEuropean Urology Open Science, 2022
- Key sunitinib‐related biomarkers for renal cell carcinomaCancer Medicine, 2021
- Management of Sporadic Renal Angiomyolipomas: A Systematic Review of Available Evidence to Guide Recommendations from the European Association of Urology Renal Cell Carcinoma Guidelines PanelEuropean Urology Oncology, 2020
- Renal mass biopsy and thermal ablation: should biopsy be performed before or during the ablation procedure?Abdominal Radiology, 2017
- Five-year Analysis of a Multi-institutional Prospective Clinical Trial of Delayed Intervention and Surveillance for Small Renal Masses: The DISSRM RegistryEuropean Urology, 2015
- Outcomes of Small Renal Mass Needle Core Biopsy, Nondiagnostic Percutaneous Biopsy, and the Role of Repeat BiopsyEuropean Urology, 2011
- Active Surveillance of Small Renal Masses: Progression Patterns of Early Stage Kidney CancerEuropean Urology, 2011
- Every Minute Counts When the Renal Hilum Is Clamped During Partial NephrectomyEuropean Urology, 2010