Reply on RC2
Authors:
- Benjamin Keith Galton-FenziBGBenjamin Keith Galton-Fenzi
- Richard Porter-SmithRPRichard Porter-Smith
- Sue CookSCSue Cook
- David E. GwytherDGDavid E. Gwyther
- Wilma G. C. HunekeWHWilma G. C. Huneke
- Madelaine G. RosevearMRMadelaine G. Rosevear
- Xylar Asay-DavisXAXylar Asay-Davis
- Michael S. DinnimanMDMichael S. Dinniman
- Kazuya KusaharaKKKazuya Kusahara
Open Access
- 10 June 2025
- other
- Published by Copernicus GmbH
- Vol. 2025, 1-27
Abstract
Societal adaptation to rising sea levels requires robust projections of the Antarctic Ice Sheet’s retreat, particularly due to ocean-driven basal melting of its fringing ice shelves. Recent advances in ocean models that simulate ice-shelf melting offer an opportunity to reduce uncertainties in ice–ocean interactions. Here, we compare several community-contributed, circum-Antarctic ocean simulations to highlight inter-model differences, evaluate agreement with satellite-derived melt rates, and examine underlying physical processes. All but one simulation use a melting formulation depending on both thermal driving (T ⋆) and friction velocity (u⋆), which together represent the thermal and ocean current forcings at the ice–ocean interface. Simulated melt rates range from 650 to 1277 Gt year−1 (m = 0.45 − 0.91 m year−1), driven by variations in model resolution, parameterisations, and sub-ice shelf circulation. Freeze-to-melt ratios span 0.30 to 30.12 %, indicating large differences in how refreezing is represented. The multi-model mean (MMM) produces an averaged melt rate of 0.60 m year−1 from a net mass loss of 842.99 Gt year−1 (876.03 Gt year−1 melting and 33.05 Gt year−1 refreezing), yielding a freeze-to-melt ratio of 3.92 %. We define a thermo-kinematic melt sensitivity, ζ = m/(T ⋆ u⋆) = 4.82 × 10−5 °C−1 for the MMM, with individual models spanning 2.85 × 10−5 to 19.4 × 10−5 °C−1. Higher melt rates typically occur near grounding zones where both T ⋆ and u⋆ exert roughly equal influence. Because friction velocity is critical for turbulent heat exchange, ice-shelf melting must be characterised by both ocean energetics and thermal forcing. Further work to standardise model setups and evaluation of results against in situ observations and satellite data will be essential for increasing model accuracy, reducing uncertainties, to improve our understanding of ice-shelf–ocean interactions and refine sea-level rise predictions.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Data initiatives for ocean-driven melt of Antarctic ice shelvesAnnals of Glaciology, 2022
- Vertical processes and resolution impact ice shelf basal melting: A multi-model studyOcean Modelling, 2020
- Attenuation and excitation of the ∼6 year oscillation in the length-of-day variationEarth and Planetary Science Letters, 2019
- Increased ice losses from Antarctica detected by CryoSat-2Geophysical Research Letters, 2014
- A simple modification of Newton’s method to achieve convergence of orderApplied Mathematics Letters, 2014
- Modeling the basal melting and marine ice accretion of the Amery Ice ShelfJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2012
- Seasonal coupling and de‐coupling of net calcification rates from coral reef metabolism and carbonate chemistry at Ningaloo Reef, Western AustraliaJournal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 2012
- Coupling of ice‐shelf melting and buttressing is a key process in ice‐sheets dynamicsGeophysical Research Letters, 2010
- Performance metrics for climate modelsJournal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2008
- Ice sheet grounding line dynamics: Steady states, stability, and hysteresisJournal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 2007