Re-conceptualizing centrality in social networks
Open Access
- 26 September 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in European Journal of Applied Mathematics
- Vol. 27 (6) , 971-985
Abstract
In the social sciences, networks are used to represent relationships between social actors, be they individuals or aggregates. The structural importance of these actors is assessed in terms of centrality indices which are commonly defined as graph invariants. Many such indices have been proposed, but there is no unifying theory of centrality. Previous attempts at axiomatic characterization have been focused on particular indices, and the conceptual frameworks that have been proposed alternatively do not lend themselves to mathematical treatment.We show that standard centrality indices, although seemingly distinct, can in fact be expressed in a common framework based on path algebras. Since, as a consequence, all of these indices preserve the neighbourhood-inclusion pre-order, the latter provides a conceptually clear criterion for the definition of centrality indices.Keywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Subgraph centrality in complex networksPhysical Review E, 2005
- Structural analysis of hypertextsACM Transactions on Information Systems, 1992
- Power and Centrality: A Family of MeasuresAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1987
- A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on BetweennessSociometry, 1977
- On the centrality in a graphScandinavian Journal of Psychology, 1974
- On the centrality in a directed graphSocial Science Research, 1973
- Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identificationThe Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1972
- An improved index of centralitySystems Research and Behavioral Science, 1965
- Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1951
- Communication Patterns in Task-Oriented GroupsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1950