Does the Timing of the Surgery Have a Major Role in Influencing the Outcome in Elders with Acute Subdural Hematomas?
Authors:
- Gianluca TrevisiGianluca Trevisi
- Alba ScerratiAlba Scerrati
- Oriela RustemiOriela Rustemi
- Luca RicciardiLuca Ricciardi
- Tamara IusTamara Ius
- Anna Maria AuricchioAnna Maria Auricchio
- Pasquale De BonisPasquale De Bonis
- Alessio AlbaneseAlessio Albanese
- Annunziato MangiolaAnnunziato Mangiola
- Rosario MaugeriRosario Maugeri
- Federico NicolosiFederico Nicolosi
- Carmelo Lucio SturialeCarmelo Lucio Sturiale
Open Access
- 30 September 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Personalized Medicine
- Vol. 12 (10) , 1612
Abstract
Background: The incidence of traumatic acute subdural hematomas (ASDH) in the elderly is increasing. Despite surgical evacuation, these patients have poor survival and low rate of functional outcome, and surgical timing plays no clear role as a predictor. We investigated whether the timing of surgery had a major role in influencing the outcome in these patients. Methods: We retrospectively retrieved clinical and radiological data of all patients ≥70 years operated on for post-traumatic ASDH in a 3 year period in five Italian hospitals. Patients were divided into three surgical timing groups from hospital arrival: ultra-early (within 6 h); early (6–24 h); and delayed (after 24 h). Outcome was measured at discharge using two endpoints: survival (alive/dead) and functional outcome at the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Univariate and multivariate predictor models were constructed. Results: We included 136 patients. About 33% died as a result of the consequences of ASDH and among the survivors, only 24% were in good functional outcome at discharge. Surgical timing groups appeared different according to presenting the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GCS), which was on average lower in the ultra-early surgery group, and radiological findings, which appeared worse in the same group. Delayed surgery was more frequent in patients with subacute clinical deterioration. Surgical timing appeared to be neither associated with survival nor with functional outcome, also after stratification for preoperative GCS. Preoperative midline shift was the strongest outcome predictor. Conclusions: An earlier surgery was offered to patients with worse clinical-radiological findings. Additionally, after stratification for GCS, it was not associated with better outcome. Among the radiological markers, preoperative midline shift was the strongest outcome predictor.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nonsurgical acute traumatic subdural hematoma: what is the risk?Journal of Neurosurgery, 2015
- Do Traumatic Brain Contusions Increase in Size after Decompressive Craniectomy?Journal of Neurotrauma, 2012
- Traumatic brain injury in older adults: characteristics, causes and consequencesInjury, 2012
- Age and Salvageability: Analysis of Outcome of Patients Older than 65 Years Undergoing Craniotomy for Acute Traumatic Subdural HematomaWorld Neurosurgery, 2012
- CT prognostic factors in acute subdural haematomas: the value of the 'worst' CT scanBritish Journal Of Neurosurgery, 2000
- One hundred and twenty-seven cases of acute subdural haematoma operated onActa Neurochirurgica, 1996
- Acute subdural haematoma in adults: an analysis of outcome in comatose patientsActa Neurochirurgica, 1993
- Justification for evacuating acute subdural haematomas in patients above the age of 75 yearsInjury, 1992
- Acute subdural hematoma: morbidity, mortality, and operative timingJournal of Neurosurgery, 1991
- Traumatic Acute Subdural HematomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1981