A Terminology for Scientific Workflow Systems
Authors:
- Frédéric SuteraFSFrédéric Sutera
- Tainã ColemanTCTainã Coleman
- İlkay AltintaşİAİlkay Altintaş
- Rosa M. BadiaRBRosa M. Badia
- Bartosz BalisBBBartosz Balis
- Kyle ChardKCKyle Chard
- Iacopo ColonnelliICIacopo Colonnelli
- Ewa DeelmanEDEwa Deelman
- Paolo Di TommasoPTPaolo Di Tommaso
- Thomas FahringerTFThomas Fahringer
- Carole GobleCGCarole Goble
- Shantenu JhaSJShantenu Jha
Preprint
Abstract
The term scientific workflow has evolved over the last two decades to encompass a broad range of compositions of interdependent compute tasks and data movements. It has also become an umbrella term for processing in modern scientific applications. Today, many scientific applications can be considered as workflows made of multiple dependent steps, and hundreds of workflow management systems (WMSs) have been developed to manage and run these workflows. However, no turnkey solution has emerged to address the diversity of scientific processes and the infrastructure on which they are implemented. Instead, new research problems requiring the execution of scientific workflows with some novel feature often lead to the development of an entirely new WMS. A direct consequence is that many existing WMSs share some salient features, offer similar functionalities, and can manage the same categories of workflows but also have some distinct capabilities. This situation makes researchers who develop workflows face the complex question of selecting a WMS. This selection can be driven by technical considerations, to find the system that is the most appropriate for their application and for the resources available to them, or other factors such as reputation, adoption, strong community support, or long-term sustainability. To address this problem, a group of WMS developers and practitioners joined their efforts to produce a community-based terminology of WMSs. This paper summarizes their findings and introduces this new terminology to characterize WMSs. This terminology is composed of fives axes: workflow characteristics, composition, orchestration, data management, and metadata capture. Each axis comprises several concepts that capture the prominent features of WMSs. Based on this terminology, this paper also presents a classification of 23 existing WMSs according to the proposed axes and terms.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- WfCommons: A framework for enabling scientific workflow research and developmentFuture Generation Computer Systems, 2022
- MPI jobs within MPI jobs: A practical way of enabling task-level fault-tolerance in HPC workflowsFuture Generation Computer Systems, 2019
- A characterization of workflow management systems for extreme-scale applicationsFuture Generation Computer Systems, 2017
- A Taxonomy and Survey of Fault-Tolerant Workflow Management Systems in Cloud and Distributed Computing Environments2017
- HyperFlow: A model of computation, programming approach and enactment engine for complex distributed workflowsFuture Generation Computer Systems, 2016
- FireWorks: a dynamic workflow system designed for high‐throughput applicationsConcurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, 2015
- A Survey of Data-Intensive Scientific Workflow ManagementJournal of Grid Computing, 2015
- ServiceSs: An Interoperable Programming Framework for the CloudJournal of Grid Computing, 2013
- Workflows and e-Science: An overview of workflow system features and capabilitiesFuture Generation Computer Systems, 2009
- A Moose and a Fox Can Aid Scientists with Data Management Problems1994