Intermanual transfer characteristics of dynamic learning: direction, coordinate frame, and consolidation of interlimb generalization
Authors:
- Christian StockingerCSChristian Stockinger
- Benjamin ThürerBTBenjamin Thürer
- Menno P. VeldmanMVMenno P. Veldman
- Natasha M. MauritsNMNatasha M. Maurits
- Inge ZijdewindIZInge Zijdewind
- Nicola A. MaffiulettiNMNicola A. Maffiuletti
- Stella van MiddelkoopSMStella van Middelkoop
- J. Chris MizelleJMJ. Chris Mizelle
- Tibor HortobágyiTHTibor Hortobágyi
- Reza ShadmehrRSReza Shadmehr
- 1 December 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Physiological Society in Journal of Neurophysiology
- Vol. 114 (6) , 3166-3176
Abstract
Intermanual transfer, i.e., generalization of motor learning across hands, is a well-accepted phenomenon of motor learning. Yet, there are open questions regarding the characteristics of this transfer, particularly the intermanual transfer of dynamic learning. In this study, we investigated intermanual transfer in a force field adaptation task concerning the direction and the coordinate frame of transfer as well as the influence of a 24-h consolidation period on the transfer. We tested 48 healthy human subjects for transfer from dominant to nondominant hand, and vice versa. We considered two features of transfer. First, we examined transfer to the untrained hand using force channel trials that suppress error feedback and learning mechanisms to assess intermanual transfer in the form of a practice-dependent bias. Second, we considered transfer by exposing the subjects to the force field with the untrained hand to check for faster learning of the dynamics (interlimb savings). Half of the subjects were tested for transfer immediately after adaptation, whereas the other half were tested after a 24-h consolidation period. Our results showed intermanual transfer both from dominant to nondominant hand and vice versa in extrinsic coordinates. After the consolidation period, transfer effects were weakened. Moreover, the transfer effects were negligible compared with the subjects' ability to rapidly adapt to the force field condition. We conclude that intermanual transfer is a bidirectional phenomenon that vanishes with time. However, the ability to transfer motor learning seems to play a minor role compared with the rapid adaptation processes.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evidence of multiple coordinate representations during generalization of motor learningExperimental Brain Research, 2014
- Catch trials in force field learning influence adaptation and consolidation of human motor memoryFrontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2014
- About Sleep's Role in MemoryPhysiological Reviews, 2013
- Trial-by-trial analysis of intermanual transfer during visuomotor adaptationJournal of Neurophysiology, 2011
- Long-Term Retention Explained by a Model of Short-Term Learning in the Adaptive Control of ReachingJournal of Neurophysiology, 2008
- Neural Averaging in Motor LearningJournal of Neurophysiology, 2007
- Intermittent Practice Facilitates Stable Motor MemoriesThe Journal of Neuroscience, 2006
- Is Interlimb Transfer of Force-Field Adaptation a Cognitive Response to the Sudden Introduction of Load?The Journal of Neuroscience, 2004
- Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handednessExperimental Brain Research, 2002
- Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reachingNature Neuroscience, 1999