Dutch senior medical students and disaster medicine: a national survey
Open Access
- 3 September 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in International Journal of Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 8 (1) , 1-5
Abstract
Medical students have been deployed in victim care of several disasters throughout history. They are corner stones in first-line care in recent pandemic planning. Furthermore, every physician and senior medical student is expected to assist in case of disaster situations, but are they educated to do so? Being one of Europe’s densest populated countries with multiple nuclear installations, a large petrochemical industry and also at risk for terrorist attacks, The Netherlands bear some risks for incidents. We evaluated the knowledge on Disaster Medicine in the Dutch medical curriculum. Our hypothesis is that Dutch senior medical students are not prepared at all. Senior Dutch medical students were invited through their faculty to complete an online survey on Disaster Medicine, training and knowledge. This reported knowledge was tested by a mixed set of 10 theoretical and practical questions. With a mean age of 25.5 years and 60 % females, 999 participants completed the survey. Of the participants, 51 % considered that Disaster Medicine should absolutely be taught in the regular medical curriculum and only 2 % felt it as useless; 13 % stated to have some knowledge on disaster medicine. Self-estimated capability to deal with various disaster situations varied from 1.47/10 in nuclear incidents to 3.92/10 in influenza pandemics. Self-estimated knowledge on these incidents is in the same line (1.71/10 for nuclear incidents and 4.27/10 in pandemics). Despite this limited knowledge and confidence, there is a high willingness to respond (ranging from 4.31/10 in Ebola outbreak over 5.21/10 in nuclear incidents to 7.54/10 in pandemics). The case/theoretical mix gave a mean score of 3.71/10 and raised some food for thought. Although a positive attitude, 48 % will place contaminated walking wounded in a waiting room and 53 % would use iodine tablets as first step in nuclear decontamination. Of the participants, 52 % even believes that these tablets protect against external radiation, 41 % thinks that these tablets limit radiation effects more than shielding and 57 % believes that decontamination of chemical victims consists of a specific antidote spray in military cabins. Despite a high willingness to respond, our students are not educated for disaster situations.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disaster Curricula in Medical Education: Pilot SurveyPrehospital and Disaster Medicine, 2012
- Disaster 101: A Novel Approach to Disaster Medicine Training for Health ProfessionalsThe Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2010
- La preocupante falta de formación en desastres dentro de las escuelas de medicina latinoamericanasRevista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 2010
- A Disaster Medicine Curriculum for Medical StudentsTeaching and Learning in Medicine, 2010
- Medical student disaster medicine education: the development of an educational resourceInternational Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2010
- Perspectives of Future Physicians on Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness: Challenges of Building a Capable and Sustainable Auxiliary Medical WorkforceDisaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 2009
- Differences in opinions on disaster myths between first-year and sixth-year medical studentsEuropean Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2009
- Why Medical Students Should Be Trained in Disaster Management: Our Experience of the Kashmir EarthquakePLOS Medicine, 2006
- Abstract 631 Teaching disaster medicine to medical students: ???learning by doing??? is a useful toolEuropean Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2006
- De eerstkomende grieppandemie: een reden tot bijzondere paraatheid. Mededelingen aan het medisch korpsTijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, 2005