Sea-surface temperature pattern effects have slowed global warming and biased warming-based constraints on climate sensitivity
Authors:
- Kyle C. ArmourKAKyle C. Armour
- Cristian ProistosescuCPCristian Proistosescu
- Lily C. HahnLHLily C. Hahn
- Edward Blanchard-WrigglesworthEBEdward Blanchard-Wrigglesworth
- Robert C. Jnglin WillsRWRobert C. Jnglin Wills
- Malte F. StueckerMSMalte F. Stuecker
- Stephen Po-ChedleySPStephen Po-Chedley
- Ivan MitevskiIMIvan Mitevski
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 11 March 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 121 (12)
Abstract
The observed rate of global warming since the 1970s has been proposed as a strong constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity (ECS) and transient climate response (TCR)—key metrics of the global climate response to greenhouse-gas forcing. Using CMIP5/6 models, we show that the inter-model relationship between warming and these climate sensitivity metrics (the basis for the constraint) arises from a similarity in transient and equilibrium warming patterns within the models, producing an effective climate sensitivity (EffCS) governing recent warming that is comparable to the value of ECS governing long-term warming under CO 2 forcing. However, CMIP5/6 historical simulations do not reproduce observed warming patterns. When driven by observed patterns, even high ECS models produce low EffCS values consistent with the observed global warming rate. The inability of CMIP5/6 models to reproduce observed warming patterns thus results in a bias in the modeled relationship between recent global warming and climate sensitivity. Correcting for this bias means that observed warming is consistent with wide ranges of ECS and TCR extending to higher values than previously recognized. These findings are corroborated by energy balance model simulations and coupled model (CESM1-CAM5) simulations that better replicate observed patterns via tropospheric wind nudging or Antarctic meltwater fluxes. Because CMIP5/6 models fail to simulate observed warming patterns, proposed warming-based constraints on ECS, TCR, and projected global warming are biased low. The results reinforce recent findings that the unique pattern of observed warming has slowed global-mean warming over recent decades and that how the pattern will evolve in the future represents a major source of uncertainty in climate projections.Keywords
Funding Information
- NSF (AGS-1752796)
- NOAA (NA20OAR4310391)
- Department of Energy (DE-SC0022110)
This publication has 81 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reducing Uncertainties in Climate Projections with Emergent Constraints: Concepts, Examples and ProspectsAdvances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2019
- Internal Variability and Disequilibrium Confound Estimates of Climate Sensitivity From ObservationsGeophysical Research Letters, 2018
- What Climate Sensitivity Index Is Most Useful for Projections?Geophysical Research Letters, 2018
- Contributions of Greenhouse Gas Forcing and the Southern Annular Mode to Historical Southern Ocean Surface Temperature TrendsGeophysical Research Letters, 2018
- Analyzing the dependence of global cloud feedback on the spatial pattern of sea surface temperature change with a Green's function approachJournal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems, 2017
- Relative roles of surface temperature and climate forcing patterns in the inconstancy of radiative feedbacksGeophysical Research Letters, 2017
- Variation in climate sensitivity and feedback parameters during the historical periodGeophysical Research Letters, 2016
- Changes in global net radiative imbalance 1985–2012Geophysical Research Letters, 2014
- Global and regional variability in marine surface temperaturesGeophysical Research Letters, 2014
- Statistical significance of climate sensitivity predictors obtained by data miningGeophysical Research Letters, 2014