Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves
- 4 November 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 31 (7) , 2820-2828
Abstract
Importance Robotic colorectal resection continues to gain in popularity. However, limited data are available regarding how surgeons gain competency and institutions develop programs. Objective To determine the number of cases required for establishing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program. Design Retrospective review. Setting Cancer center. Patients We reviewed 418 robotic-assisted resections for colorectal adenocarcinoma from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2014, by surgeons at a single institution. The individual surgeon’s and institutional learning curve were examined. The earliest adopter, Surgeon 1, had the highest volume. Surgeons 2–4 were later adopters. Surgeon 5 joined the group with robotic experience. Interventions A cumulative summation technique (CUSUM) was used to construct learning curves and define the number of cases required for the initial learning phase. Perioperative variables were analyzed across learning phases. Main outcome measure Case numbers for each stage of the learning curve. Results The earliest adopter, Surgeon 1, performed 203 cases. CUSUM analysis of surgeons’ experience defined three learning phases, the first requiring 74 cases. Later adopters required 23–30 cases for their initial learning phase. For Surgeon 1, operative time decreased from 250 to 213.6 min from phase 1–3 (P = 0.008), with no significant changes in intraoperative complication or leak rate. For Surgeons 2–4, operative time decreased from 418 to 361.9 min across the two phases (P = 0.004). Their intraoperative complication rate decreased from 7.8 to 0 % (P = 0.03); the leak rate was not significantly different (9.1 vs. 1.5 %, P = 0.07), though it may be underpowered given the small number of events. Conclusions Our data suggest that establishing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program requires approximately 75 cases. Once a program is well established, the learning curve is shorter and surgeons require fewer cases (25–30) to reach proficiency. These data suggest that the institutional learning curve extends beyond a single surgeon’s learning experience.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institutes of Health (P30 CA008748)
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Comparison of the Operative, Oncological, and Functional OutcomesAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2014
- Robotic Colorectal SurgeryJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2014
- The multiphasic learning curve for robot-assisted rectal surgerySurgical Endoscopy, 2013
- Robotic total mesorectal excision: operative technique and review of the literatureTechniques in Coloproctology, 2013
- Total mesorectal excision: a comparison of oncological and functional outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancerSurgical Endoscopy, 2013
- The role of a well‐trained team on the early learning curve of robot‐assisted laparoscopic procedures: the example of radical prostatectomyThe International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2011
- Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: Short-Term Outcome of a Prospective Comparative StudyAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2009
- Robotic SurgeryAnnals of Surgery, 2004
- Telerobotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Right and Sigmoid Colectomies for Benign DiseaseDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2002
- The use of the Cusum Technique in the assessment of trainee competence in new proceduresInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2000