Use of the MEGA Exposure Database for the Validation of the Stoffenmanager Model
Open Access
- 7 November 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Annals of Work Exposures and Health
- Vol. 56 (4) , 426-439
Abstract
This paper explores the usefulness of the exposure database MEGA for model validation and evaluates the capability of two Stoffenmanager model equations (i.e. handling of powders/granules and machining) to estimate workers exposure to inhalable dust. For the task groups, ‘handling of powders and granules’ (handling) and ‘machining of wood and stone’ (machining) measurements were selected from MEGA and grouped in scenarios depending on task, product, and control measures. The predictive capability of the model was tested by calculating the relative bias of the single measurements and the correlation between geometric means (GMs) for scenarios. The conservatism of the model was evaluated by checking if the percentage of measurement values above the 90th percentile estimate was ≤10%. From 22 596 personal measurements on inhalable dust within MEGA, 390 could be selected for handling and 1133 for machining. The relative bias for the task groups was −25 and 68%, respectively, the percentage of measurements with a higher result than the estimated 90th percentile 11 and 7%. Correlations on a scenario level were good for both model equations as well for the GM (handling: rs = 0.90, n = 15 scenarios; machining: rs = 0.84, n = 22 scenarios) as for the 90th percentile (handling: rs = 0.79; machining: rs = 0.76). The MEGA database could be used for model validation, although the presented analyses have learned that improvements in the database are necessary for modelling purposes in the future. For a substantial amount of data, contextual information on exposure determinants in addition to basic core information is stored in this database. The relative low bias, the good correlation, and the level of conservatism of the tested model show that the Stoffenmanager can be regarded as a useful Tier 1 model for the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals legislation.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- REACH—how is it going?Annals of Work Exposures and Health, 2009
- Development and Evaluation of an Exposure Control Efficacy Library (ECEL)Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 2008
- ‘Stoffenmanager’, a Web-Based Control Banding Tool Using an Exposure Process ModelAnnals of Occupational Hygiene, 2008
- The BG Measurement System for Hazardous Substances (BGMG) and the Exposure Database of Hazardous Substances (MEGA)International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 2006
- Evaluation of COSHH Essentials for Vapor Degreasing and Bag Filling OperationsAnnals of Occupational Hygiene, 2005
- Validity of empirical models of exposure in asphalt pavingOccupational and Environmental Medicine, 2002
- Validation of a New Method for Structured Subjective Assessment of Past ConcentrationsAnnals of Occupational Hygiene, 1999
- A COLLABORATIVE EUROPEAN STUDY OF PERSONAL INHALABLE AEROSOL SAMPLER PERFORMANCEAnnals of Occupational Hygiene, 1997
- European Proposal for Core Information for the Storage and Exchange of Workplace Exposure Measurements on Chemical AgentsApplied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 1997
- Statistical Evaluation of Exposure Assessment StrategiesApplied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 1991