Do Preference Reversals Disappear When We Allow for Probabilistic Choice?
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 January 2017
- journal article
- Published by Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in Management Science
- Vol. 63 (1) , 166-184
Abstract
The “preference reversal phenomenon,” a systematic disparity between people’s valuations and choices, poses challenges for theory and policy. Using a very general formulation of probabilistic preferences, we show that the phenomenon is not mainly due to intransitive choice. We find a high degree of regularity within choice tasks and also within valuation tasks, but the two types of tasks appear to evoke very different cognitive processes, even when the experimental environment tries to minimise differences. We discuss possible implications for modelling and eliciting preferences. Data, as supplemental material, are available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2333 . This paper was accepted by Manel Baucells, decision analysis.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Risk aversion and framing effectsExperimental Economics, 2012
- Models of stochastic choice and decision theories: why both are important for analyzing decisionsJournal of Applied Econometrics, 2009
- Imprecision as an Account of the Preference Reversal PhenomenonAmerican Economic Review, 2007
- Extending the Bounds of Rationality: Evidence and Theories of Preferential ChoiceJournal of Economic Literature, 2006
- Preference ReversalJournal of Economic Surveys, 2002
- Intransitive cycles: Rational choice or random error? An answer based on estimation of error rates with experimental dataTheory and Decision, 1993
- Observing Violations of Transitivity by Experimental MethodsEconometrica, 1991
- Experimental comparison of individual behavior under risk and under uncertainty for gains and for lossesOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1987
- Inconsistent preferences among gambles.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971
- Category judgment: A range-frequency model.Psychological Review, 1965