What you see is not what you get: single-family house renovation and energy retrofit seen through the lens of sociomateriality
Authors:
- 2 November 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Construction Management and Economics
- Vol. 35 (5) , 276-287
Abstract
Representing 30% of the energy consumption in Sweden, the built environment is a clear contender for climate mitigation initiatives. The substantial stock of single-family houses presents ample opportunities to engage in energy-saving refurbishments. However, despite political pressure, only a minority of these refurbishments includes low-energy retrofit. To explain this slow take-off, studies have mostly focused on the necessity to better link new technical solutions with user needs and behaviours. We propose to extend this analysis to a broader set of actors including the craftsmen contracted to carry out the refurbishments and the houses themselves with their specific features and characteristics. To do so, we build our contribution on the concept of sociomateriality. This perspective argues that technological artefacts are socially constructed, but recognizes that materiality also has a role to play. Drawing on the experiences of 24 small craftsman firms, 8 houses as well as their owners, our method comprises interviews, workshops and participant observation complemented by an in-depth case study. The results show many differentiated representations of the renovation process under scrutiny. All these representations need to be understood and to a certain degree aligned in order to achieve successful retrofits.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mundane Objects and the Banality of EvilJournal of Management Inquiry, 2012
- Business model changes and green construction processesConstruction Management and Economics, 2012
- Managing digital coordination of design: emerging hybrid practices in an institutionalized project settingEngineering Project Organization Journal, 2011
- Editorial: objects, knowledge sharing and knowledge transformation in projectsConstruction Management and Economics, 2010
- Coordination and control in project‐based work: digital objects and infrastructures for deliveryConstruction Management and Economics, 2010
- Constructing buildings and design ambitionsConstruction Management and Economics, 2010
- Actors and objects: a socio‐technical networks approach to technology uptake in the construction sectorConstruction Management and Economics, 2010
- Managing knowledge in platforms: boundary objects and stocks and flows of knowledgeConstruction Management and Economics, 2010
- Informing the Development of Domestic Energy Efficiency InitiativesEnvironment and Behavior, 2005
- Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39Social Studies of Science, 1989