Seeing the forest for the trees: How to interpret a meta‐analysis forest plot
Open Access
- 14 December 2020
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Vol. 77 (3) , 1097-1101
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using risk and odds ratios to assess effect size for meta‐analysis outcome measuresJournal of Advanced Nursing, 2020
- Quality Control in Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysesEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2010
- A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysisResearch Synthesis Methods, 2010
- More Than Numbers: The Power of Graphs in Meta-AnalysisAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 2008
- Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta‐analysisJournal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2008
- A Practical Guide to Meta-AnalysisThe Journal of Hand Surgery, 2006
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analysesBMJ, 2003
- Statistical heterogeneity in systematic reviews of clinical trials: a critical appraisal of guidelines and practiceJournal of Health Services Research & Policy, 2002
- A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelinesBMJ, 2001
- Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis2001