Private Tutoring and Demand for Education in South Korea
Authors:
- Sunwoong KimSKSunwoong Kim
- Ju‐Ho LeeJLJu‐Ho Lee
- 1 January 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in Economic Development and Cultural Change
- Vol. 58 (2) , 259-296
Abstract
Private tutoring in South Korea is quite pervasive. In 2006, the household sector spent 2.57% of the nation's GDP on private tutoring for primary and secondary school students. Government spending on those students was about 3.5% of GDP, which is about the average level among OECD countries. Despite the substantial government expenditure on the formal education system and strong policies that try to reduce private tutoring activities, household spending on private tutoring has been increasing very rapidly. We argue that the prevalence of private tutoring is a market response to the government's rigid and uniform education policy. The desire to enter elite universities in a very hierarchical higher education system and a heavily regulated and equalized secondary school system has created an enormous demand for supplementary private tutoring. Empirical analyses indicate that students with high academic ability and high family income whose parents are highly educated spend more on private tutoring. Also, students in regions without school choice spend more on private tutoring. The estimated income elasticity of private tutoring is about 0.5. Pervasive private tutoring may create an inefficient as well as inequitable educational system. Korean experience studied in this article suggests that private tutoring should be studied as an integral part of the whole educational system. (c) 2010 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved..Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Policies to Reduce Rent Seeking in Controlled MarketsInternational Economic Journal, 2007
- Private supplementary tutoring: comparative perspectives on patterns and implicationsCompare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 2006
- Private costs and the rate of return to primary educationApplied Economics Letters, 1999
- PRIVATE TUTORING AND PUBLIC CORRUPTION: A COST‐EFFECTIVE EDUCATION SYSTEM FOR DEVELOPING COUNTRIESThe Developing Economies, 1999
- Public Provision of Private GoodsJournal of Political Economy, 1996
- Should Education Be Subsidized?Public Finance Quarterly, 1996
- Public Provision of Private Goods as a Redistributive Device in an Optimum Income Tax ModelThe Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1995
- Inequality and Growth Reconsidered: Lessons from East AsiaThe World Bank Economic Review, 1995
- Shadow Education and Allocation in Formal Schooling: Transition to University in JapanAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1992
- Least absolute deviations estimation for the censored regression modelJournal of Econometrics, 1984