Use of vitamin K antagonists for secondary stroke prevention depends on the treating healthcare provider in Germany – results from the German AFNET registry
Authors:
- on behalf of the AFNET registry investigatorsOIon behalf of the AFNET registry investigators
- Karl Georg HaeuslerKHKarl Georg Haeusler
- Andrea GerthAGAndrea Gerth
- Tobias LimbourgTLTobias Limbourg
- Ulrich TebbeUTUlrich Tebbe
- Michael OeffMOMichael Oeff
- Karl WegscheiderKWKarl Wegscheider
- András TreszlATAndrás Treszl
- Ursula RavensURUrsula Ravens
- Thomas MeinertzTMThomas Meinertz
- Paulus KirchhofPKPaulus Kirchhof
- Günter BreithardtGBGünter Breithardt
Open Access
- 5 August 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Neurology
- Vol. 15 (1) , 1-8
Abstract
Anticoagulation using vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) significantly reduces the risk of recurrent stroke in stroke patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and is recommended by guidelines. The German Competence NETwork on Atrial Fibrillation established a nationwide prospective registry including 9,574 AF patients, providing the opportunity to analyse AF management according to German healthcare providers. On enrolment, 896 (9.4 %) patients reported a prior ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack. Stroke patients were significantly older, more likely to be female, had a higher rate of cardiovascular risk factors, and more frequently received anticoagulation (almost exclusively VKA) than patients without prior stroke history. Following enrolment, 76.4 % of all stroke patients without VKA contraindications received anticoagulation, which inversely associated with age (OR 0.95 per year; 95 % CI 0.92–0.97). General practitioners/internists (OR 0.40; 95 % CI 0.21–0.77) and physicians working in regional hospitals (OR 0.47; 95 % CI 0.29–0.77) prescribed anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention less frequently than physicians working at university hospitals (reference) and office-based cardiologists (OR 1.40; 95 % CI 0.76–2.60). The impact of the treating healthcare provider was less evident in registry patients without prior stroke. In the AFNET registry, anticoagulation for secondary stroke prevention was prescribed in roughly three-quarters of AF patients, a significantly higher rate than in primary prevention. We identified two factors associated with withholding oral anticoagulation in stroke survivors, namely higher age and—most prominently—treatment by a general practitioner/internist or physicians working at regional hospitals.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Differences and trends in stroke prevention anticoagulation in primary care vs cardiology specialty management of new atrial fibrillation: The Retrospective Evaluation and Assessment of Therapies in AF (TREAT-AF) studyAmerican Heart Journal, 2013
- Oral anticoagulation use by patients with atrial fibrillation in GermanyThrombosis and Haemostasis, 2012
- Efficacy and safety of vernakalant in patients with atrial flutter: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialEP Europace, 2012
- Management of atrial fibrillation by primary care physicians in Germany: baseline results of the ATRIUM registryClinical Research in Cardiology, 2011
- Anticoagulation for stroke prevention in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation, including those with falls and/or early-stage dementia: A single-center, retrospective, observational studyThe American Journal of Geriatric Pharmacotherapy, 2009
- The Registry of the German Competence NETwork on Atrial Fibrillation: patient characteristics and initial managementEP Europace, 2008
- Should we abandon the common practice of withholding oral anticoagulation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation?European Heart Journal, 2008
- ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: full text: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2001 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm SocietyEP Europace, 2006
- Contribution of Atrial Fibrillation to Incidence and Outcome of Ischemic StrokeStroke, 2005
- Stroke prevention and atrial fibrillation: reasons leading to an inappropriate management. Main results of the SAFE II studyBritish Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2004