COURSE BIDDING AT BUSINESS SCHOOLS*
- 24 February 2010
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in International Economic Review
- Vol. 51 (1) , 99-123
Abstract
Mechanisms that rely on course bidding are widely used at business schools in order to allocate seats at oversubscribed courses. Bids play two key roles under these mechanisms: to infer student preferences and to determine who have bigger claims on course seats. We show that these two roles may easily conflict, and preferences induced from bids may significantly differ from the true preferences. Therefore, these mechanisms, which are promoted as market mechanisms, do not necessarily yield market outcomes. We introduce a Pareto‐dominant market mechanism that can be implemented by asking students for their preferences in addition to their bids over courses.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Matching with Contracts: CommentAmerican Economic Review, 2008
- Matching with ContractsAmerican Economic Review, 2005
- The Boston Public School MatchAmerican Economic Review, 2005
- The New York City High School MatchAmerican Economic Review, 2005
- Kidney ExchangeThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2004
- Efficient Resource Allocation on the Basis of PrioritiesEconometrica, 2002
- The Economist as Engineer: Game Theory, Experimentation, and Computation as Tools for Design EconomicsEconometrica, 2002
- Putting Auction Theory to Work: The Simultaneous Ascending AuctionJournal of Political Economy, 2000
- The Redesign of the Matching Market for American Physicians: Some Engineering Aspects of Economic DesignAmerican Economic Review, 1999
- Job Matching, Coalition Formation, and Gross SubstitutesEconometrica, 1982