Selecting Therapeutic Strategies Based on Efficacy and Death in Multicourse Clinical Trials
Authors:
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Vol. 97 (457) , 29-39
Abstract
Therapy of rapidly fatal diseases often requires multiple courses of treatment. In each course, the treatment may achieve the desired clinical goal (“response”), the patient may survive without response (“failure”), or the patient may die. When treatment fails in a given course, it is common medical practice to switch to a different treatment for the next course. Most statistical approaches to such settings simply ignore the multicourse structure. They characterize patient outcome as a single binary variable, combine death and failure, and identify only one treatment for each patient. Such approaches waste important information. We provide a statistical framework, including a family of generalized logistic regression models and an approximate Bayesian method, that incorporates historical data while accommodating multiple treatment courses, a trinary outcome in each course, and patient prognostic covariates. The framework serves as a basis for data analysis, treatment evaluation, and clinical trial design....Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating multiple treatment courses in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2000
- A Design for Testing Clinical Strategies: Biased Adaptive Within-Subject RandomizationJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 2000
- Decision Theoretic Designs for Phase II Clinical Trials with Multiple OutcomesBiometrics, 1999
- Treatment Comparisons Based on Two‐Dimensional Safety and Efficacy Alternatives in Oncology TrialsBiometrics, 1999
- Bayesian Variable Selection Method for Censored Survival Data1998
- Bayes FactorsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1995
- Bayesian Subset Analysis1991
- Hypothesis testing and sample size for bivariate binomial response in the comparison of two groupsJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1985