Non-Ultrasound-Guided Versus Ultrasound-Guided Femoral Venous Puncture in the Interventional Pulmonary Embolism Era: Does Ultrasound Guidance Improve Safety and Feasibility?
Open Access
- 16 September 2026
- journal article
- Published by IMR Press in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine
- Vol. 27 (9) , 46795
Abstract
Background: The use of interventional endovascular therapy for pulmonary embolism (PE) has become increasingly important over the last decade. In contrast to other cardiovascular interventions, these procedures carry a higher risk of access-related bleeding due to the acute clinical setting, elevated body mass index, and the frequent need for high-dose anticoagulation. However, there is still no clear consensus regarding the optimal vascular access site for endovascular PE therapy or the impact of ultrasound (US)-guided puncture on access-related complications. Methods: We treated 89 patients with intermediate- to high-risk PE using the Ekosonic endovascular system (EKOS). Group A (n = 39) underwent femoral venous puncture without US guidance, and Group B (n = 50) underwent US-guided femoral venous puncture. Results: Intraprocedural complications differed significantly between the two groups, with a higher incidence of vascular access complications in the non-US-guided group. Access-site pseudoaneurysms and retroperitoneal bleeding events occurred exclusively in the non-US-guided group (n = 6). Major (n = 3) and moderate (n = 5) bleeding events were also observed only in the non-US-guided group (p < 0.001). However, the total length of stay in the intermediate care unit and in the hospital did not differ between the groups. These findings are consistent with prior reports from other interventional settings that demonstrate fewer bleeding events among patients undergoing US-guided procedures. Conclusion: Widespread adoption of US-guided puncture in interventional PE therapy could reduce access-related complications, increase first-pass success, and reduce the number of puncture attempts, inadvertent arterial punctures, and unsuccessful access-site cannulations, particularly in patients with unfavorable access anatomy, obesity, or anatomical variations. Further education and implementation of US-guided access into training programs could improve the adoption of this technique.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)European Heart Journal, 2024
- Ultrasound‐assisted endovascular thrombolysis versus large‐bore thrombectomy in acute intermediate‐high risk pulmonary embolism: The propensity‐matched EKNARI cohort studyCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 2024
- Anatomical variation of femoral vessels and ultrasound‐guided femoral vein puncture for catheter ablation of arrhythmiasPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 2024
- Clinical Effect of Modified Ultrasound-Guided Subclavian Vein PunctureInternational Journal Of Clinical Practice, 2023
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Obese Patients with Venous Thromboembolism: Results of an Expert Consensus PanelThe American Journal of Medicine, 2023
- Ultrasound-facilitated, catheter-directed thrombolysis vs anticoagulation alone for acute intermediate-high-risk pulmonary embolism: Rationale and design of the HI-PEITHO studyAmerican Heart Journal, 2022
- Indigo Aspiration System for Treatment of Pulmonary EmbolismJACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2021
- Dosage of Anticoagulants in Obesity: Recommendations Based on a Systematic ReviewSeminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, 2020
- Ultrasound-guided versus conventional femoral venipuncture for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a multicentre randomized efficacy and safety trial (ULTRA-FAST trial)EP Europace, 2017
- Ultrasound guidance versus anatomical landmarks for internal jugular vein catheterizationCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015