A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study Assessing Self-Reported Adverse Events following Immunization (AEFI) of the COVID-19 Vaccine in Bangladesh
Authors:
- Arifa SultanaASArifa Sultana
- Saimon ShahriarSaimon Shahriar
- Rafat TahsinRTRafat Tahsin
- Sabiha Rahman MimSMSabiha Rahman Mim
- Kazi Rubiya FatemaKazi Rubiya Fatema
- Ananya SahaASAnanya Saha
- Fahmida YesminFahmida Yesmin
- Nasiba Binte BaharNasiba Binte Bahar
- Mithun SamodderMithun Samodder
- Ariful Haque MamunAriful Haque Mamun
- Aknur RahmanARAknur Rahman
- Sonia FerdousySFSonia Ferdousy
Open Access
Abstract
Background: The Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine (Covishield) was the first to be introduced in Bangladesh to fight the ongoing global COVID-19 pandemic. As this vaccine had shown some side-effects in its clinical trial, we aimed to conduct a study assessing short-term adverse events following immunization (AEFIs) in Bangladesh. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted on social and electronic media platforms by delivering an online questionnaire among people who had taken at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine. The collected data were then analysed to evaluate various parameters related to the AEFIs of the respondents. Results: A total of 626 responses were collected. Of these, 623 were selected based on complete answers and used for the analysis. Most of the respondents were between 30–60 years of age, and 40.4% were female. We found that a total of 8.5% of the total respondents had been infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Our survey revealed that out of 623 volunteers, 317 reported various side-effects after taking the vaccine, which is about 50.88% of the total participants. The majority of participants (37.07%, 231/623) reported swelling and pain at the injection site and fever (25.84%, 162/623); these were some of the common localized and generalized symptoms after the COVID-19 vaccine administration. Conclusion: The side-effects reported after receiving the Oxford–AstraZeneca vaccine (Covishield) are similar to those reported in clinical trials, demonstrating that the vaccines have a safe therapeutic window. Moreover, further research is needed to determine the efficacy of existing vaccines in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infections or after-infection hospitalization.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interventions in Anticancer ResearchCurrent Pharmaceutical Design, 2021
- Preferences for a COVID-19 vaccine in AustraliaVaccine, 2021
- Postapproval Vaccine Safety Surveillance for COVID-19 Vaccines in the USJAMA, 2020
- Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysisResearch and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2020
- Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccination during the COVID-19 Pandemic in ChinaVaccines, 2020
- Pathophysiology, Transmission, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)JAMA, 2020
- Threat of COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Pakistan: The Need for Measures to Neutralize Misleading NarrativesThe American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2020
- Coagulopathy in COVID-19 and Its Implication for Safe and Efficacious ThromboprophylaxisHamostaseologie, 2020
- Vaccines for SARS-CoV-2: Lessons from Other Coronavirus StrainsInfectious Diseases and Therapy, 2020
- Making sense of Cronbach's alphaInternational Journal of Medical Education, 2011