A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure
Authors:
- Michael J. LambertMLMichael J. Lambert
- Cory HarmonCHCory Harmon
- Stevan Lars NielsenSNStevan Lars Nielsen
- David W. SmartDSDavid W. Smart
- Kenichi ShimokawaKSKenichi Shimokawa
- Scott W. SuttonSSScott W. Sutton
- 17 December 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Clinical Psychology
- Vol. 61 (2) , 155-163
Abstract
Many branches of medicine rely heavily on lab tests to monitor client treatment response and use this information to modify their treatment. By contrast, those who offer psychological interventions seldom rely on formal assessments (lab tests) to monitor their clients' response to treatment. Data are presented that demonstrate that clinicians rarely accurately predict who will not benefit from psychotherapy. This finding is contrasted with the use of a questionnaire (lab test data) and decision rules on the basis of a client's expected progress. Results have indicated that formal methods of monitoring were able to identify 100% of the patients whose condition had deteriorated at termination, and 85% by the time they had attended three treatment sessions. Practitioners are encouraged to consider formal methods of identifying the deteriorating client. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Clin Psychol/In Session.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Use of Outcome Measures by Psychologists in Clinical Practice.Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 2004
- Do early responders to psychotherapy maintain treatment gains?Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2002
- Psychotherapy quality control: the statistical generation of expected recovery curves for integration into an early warning systemClinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 2001
- Rapid response to cognitive behavior therapy.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1999
- Reconsidering rapid early response in cognitive behavioral therapy for depression.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1999
- Toward a stepped care approach to treating problem drinkers: the predictive utility of within‐treatment variables and therapist prognostic ratingsAddiction, 1997
- Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical–statistical controversy.Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1996
- Meta‐analysis on the treatment of panic disorder with agoraphobia: Review and re‐examinationClinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 1995
- Negative outcome in psychotherapy: A critical review.Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1995
- Experience and validity of clinical judgment: The illusory correlationBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 1989