Debonding force and shear bond strength of an array of CAD/CAM-based customized orthodontic brackets, placed by indirect bonding- An In Vitro study
Open Access
- 11 September 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 13 (9) , e0202952
Abstract
Based on three-dimensional scanning and computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques, customized bracket systems are increasingly used. However, data remain limited regarding customized bracket design, characteristics, and stability. This study was undertaken to evaluate the design, bond strength, and residual adhesives of four different CAD/CAM customized brackets that were attached to human tooth specimens by indirect bonding. Thirty extracted human upper premolars were divided into five groups: Group 1, preadjusted self-ligating labial metal bracket; Group 2, lingual self-ligating metal injection molding customized bracket; Group 3, gold-casted lingual customized bracket; Group 4, labial self-ligating milled customized bracket; Group 5, labial customized resin base bracket. Except in Group 1, premolar specimens were scanned via model scanner, and the images were sent to each manufacturing company to fabricate customized brackets and transfer trays/jigs. Debonding force (DF; N) was measured by Instron universal testing machine and shear bond strength (SBS; MPa) was calculated via dividing DF by bonding area. Adhesive remnants were analyzed via stereo microscopic images. Group 2 (196.90±82.75 N) exhibited significantly higher DF than Group 1 (62.77±12.65 N); other groups exhibited similar DFs, compared with Group 1. No customized bracket groups exhibited significant differences in SBS, relative to Group 1 (6.73±1.36 MPa). However, SBS in Group 5 (11.46±7.22 MPa) was significantly higher than in Group 3 (3.58±2.14 MPa). Group 3 had significantly lower ARI scores than other groups (P<0.05). Customized brackets exhibited large deviations in DF and SBS; all customized bracket systems exhibited DF that was equivalent or superior to that of preadjusted brackets, even when placed by indirect bonding.Keywords
Funding Information
- Korea Ministry of Food and Drug (16172MFDS335)
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Debonding forces of three different customized bases of a lingual bracket systemThe Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 2013
- Effects of silanation time on shear bond strength between a gold alloy surface and metal bracketThe Korean Journal of Orthodontics, 2013
- Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmile™ method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapyThe Angle Orthodontist, 2011
- The effect of different surface preparation techniques on the survival probabilities of orthodontic brackets bonded to nanofill composite resinJournal of Orthodontics, 2010
- A novel bracket base design: biomechanical stabilityEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 2009
- Effects of buccal versus lingual surfaces, enamel conditioning procedures and storage duration on brackets debonding characteristicsJournal of Dentistry, 2005
- Bond strength of various bracket base designsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2004
- Customized brackets and archwires for lingual orthodontic treatmentAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2003
- The influence of orthodontic bracket base design on shear bond strengthAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2003
- Bond strength comparison: A simplified indirect technique versus direct placement of bracketsAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1989