Observational study on the comparability of the clinical profiles of older adults with hip fractures and pelvic fractures in Germany
Open Access
- 8 May 2026
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie
Abstract
Background/objective: Orthogeriatric co-management (OGCM) significantly improves outcomes in older adults with hip fractures; however, it remains unclear whether older adults with pelvic fractures can similarly benefit. This study aimed to compare clinical and geriatric profiles of older adults with hip fractures and pelvic fractures across relevant medical and geriatric domains. Demonstrating comparable profiles would support future prospective studies evaluating OGCM in patients with pelvic fractures. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from an ongoing observational study at our institution including 611 hospitalized adults aged 70 years or older with hip fractures ( n = 535) or pelvic fractures ( n = 76). Variables included age, functional status, comorbidity burden and incidence of delirium. Group comparisons were performed using the χ 2 -test for categorical variables and the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables. After Bonferroni adjustment, a p -value < 0.005 was considered statistically significant. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of Heinrich Heine University. Results: The median age was 85 years (interquartile range 80–89 years) and 69% of patients were female. Hip fractures accounted for 87.6% of cases and pelvic fractures for 12.4%. Both groups showed a high burden of comorbidity and geriatric impairment, including cognitive impairment, functional limitations, frailty and medical comorbidity. Most clinical parameters were comparable between groups. Although surgery was performed much more frequently in the hip fracture group, no significant differences in the overall medical and geriatric profiles were observed except for transfusion rate and postoperative delirium. Conclusion: Older adults with hip fractures and pelvic fractures have largely comparable clinical and geriatric profiles. Given the established benefits of OGCM in hip fracture care, a similar approach could also benefit patients with pelvic fractures. This hypothesis should be evaluated in future prospective interventional studies.Keywords
Funding Information
- Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf. Anstalt öffentlichen Rechts
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Orthogeriatric co-management in pelvic and acetabular fracturesArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024
- Fragility fractures in Europe: burden, management and opportunitiesArchives of Osteoporosis, 2020
- The orthogeriatric comanagement improves clinical outcomes of hip fracture in older adultsOsteoporosis International, 2019
- AltersTraumaZentrum DGU®: Evaluation klinischer und ökonomischer ParameterDer Unfallchirurg, 2018
- The test of time: a history of clock drawingInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2017
- Validierung der deutschen Fassung des Six-Item ScreenersZeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie, 2017
- Clinical pathways for fragility fractures of the pelvic ring: personal experience and review of the literatureJournal of Orthopaedic Science, 2015
- AltersTraumaZentrum DGU®Der Unfallchirurg, 2014
- Survival and Functional Outcomes After Hip Fracture Among Nursing Home ResidentsJAMA Internal Medicine, 2014
- Studies of Illness in the AgedJAMA, 1963