Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: Dose-Dependent Effects of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine on Maternal Hemodynamics
Authors:
- Marc Van de VeldeMVMarc Van de Velde
- Dominique Van SchoubroeckDSDominique Van Schoubroeck
- Jacques JaniJJJacques Jani
- An TeunkensATAn Teunkens
- Carlo MissantCMCarlo Missant
- J DeprestJDJ Deprest
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Vol. 103 (1) , 187-190
Abstract
Hypotension remains an important side effect of spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. There is limited evidence that reducing the spinal dose has a favorable effect on maternal hemodynamic stability. We designed the present randomized trial to test the hypothesis that reducing the spinal dose of local anesthetics results in equally effective anesthesia and less maternal hypotension. Fifty term pregnant patients were randomly assigned to two study groups. In the HIGH-group combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was performed using 9.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with 2.5 μg sufentanil. In the LOW-group combined spinal-epidural anesthesia was performed using 6.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with 2.5 μg sufentanil. Demographic data, obstetrical data, visual analog scale score for pain, number of medical interventions for pain, maternal hemodynamics, and neonatal outcome were recorded. Patients in the HIGH-group experienced more pronounced and longer hypotensive periods as compared with the LOW-group. The mean lowest recorded systolic blood pressure was higher in the LOW-group (102 ± 16 versus 88 ± 16 in the HIGH-group; P < 0.05). More patients in the HIGH-group experienced hypotension compared with the LOW-group (68% versus 16%; P < 0.05). In the HIGH-group 15 patients required pharmacological treatment for hypotension compared with 5 in the LOW-group. Duration of effective anesthesia (block to cold sensation above or at T3) was longer in the HIGH-group as compared with the LOW-group (95 ± 25 versus 68 ± 18 min, respectively, P < 0.05). We conclude that small-dose spinal anesthesia (6.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with sufentanil) better preserves maternal hemodynamic stability with equally effective anesthesia that is of shorter duration.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia Using Epidural Volume Extension Leads to Faster Motor Recovery After Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind StudyAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2004
- A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Prophylactic Intravenous Ephedrine for the Prevention of Hypotension During Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean DeliveryAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2004
- Combined spinal epidural anaesthesia is better than spinal or epidural alone for Caesarean deliveryBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 2003
- Small-Dose Hyperbaric Versus Plain Bupivacaine During Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean SectionAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1998
- Hydroxyethylstarch compared with modified gelatin as volume preload before spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean sectionBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1996
- Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean sectionBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995
- Volume preloading, spinal hypotension and caesarean sectionBritish Journal of Anaesthesia, 1995
- Fetal Acidemia Associated With Regional Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean DeliveryObstetrics & Gynecology, 1995
- Low Dose of Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine Combined with Epidural Lidocaine for Cesarean Section ??? A Balance Block TechniqueAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1994
- A Reevaluation of the Role of Crystalloid Preload in the Prevention of Hypotension Associated with Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean SectionAnesthesiology, 1993