A Strategic Implementation of the Shapley Value for the Nested Cost‐Sharing Problem
Authors:
- 30 March 2016
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Public Economic Theory
- Vol. 19 (1) , 219-233
Abstract
When agents have different needs for a public facility but serving a given agent allows serving all agents with smaller needs than his without any extra cost, how should the agents divide the cost of the facility among themselves? We provide a strategic implementation of the Shapley value for this class of cost‐sharing problems. We introduce a three‐stage extensive form game that respects individual rationality and show that there is one and only one subgame‐perfect equilibrium outcome of the game. Moreover, it is the allocation assigned by the Shapley value.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2013S1A3A2055391)
- Academia Sinica (AS-99-CDA-H01)
- Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (NSC-102-2410-H-001-010-MY3, NSC-102-2410-H-006-002-MY2)
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Axiomatic and strategic justifications for the constrained equal benefits rule in the airport problemGames and Economic Behavior, 2012
- Characterizations of the sequential equal contributions rule for the airport problemInternational Journal of Economic Theory, 2012
- On implementation via demand commitment gamesInternational Journal of Game Theory, 1998
- Shared irrigation costs: An empirical and axiomatic analysisMathematical Social Sciences, 1998
- Bargaining and ValueEconometrica, 1996
- Auctioning the Provision of an Indivisible Public GoodJournal of Economic Theory, 1994
- Bargaining Foundations of Shapely ValueEconometrica, 1989
- A compensation mechanism for siting noxious facilities: Theory and experimental designJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1987
- Game theoretic analysis of a bankruptcy problem from the TalmudJournal of Economic Theory, 1985
- The Shapley Value as Aircraft Landing Fees–RevisitedManagement Science, 1982