Epistemic legitimizing strategies, commitment and accountability in discourse
- 25 December 2011
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Discourse Studies
- Vol. 13 (6) , 789-797
Abstract
Hart (this issue) offers a biologically based explanation for the use of an ‘epistemic positioning strategy’ aimed by speakers/writers at the legitimization of assertions, at persuading addressees of the veracity of the propositions, as a prior condition for the discursive legitimization of actions. This article focuses on various issues addressed in Hart’s article, among them the degree of commitment invoked in speakers/writers’ choice of epistemic stance expressions as legitimization strategies, as well as the expression of subjectivity/intersubjectivity in discourse and the degree to which this involves responsibility and accountability for the speaker/writer. The article also provides an alternative proposal of the categories identified by Bednarek (2006) for the conceptual domain of evidentiality.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Degrees of subjectivity in epistemic modals and perspective representation2011
- Hearsay in European languages: toward an integrative account of grammatical and lexical marking2010
- Epistemological positioning and evidentiality in English news discourse: A text-driven approachText & Talk, 2006
- Epistemic marking and reliability judgments: evidence from BulgarianJournal of Pragmatics, 2001
- The place of evidentiality within the universal grammatical spaceJournal of Pragmatics, 2001
- Introduction: evidentiality and related notionsJournal of Pragmatics, 2001
- Modality’s semantic mapLinguistic Typology, 1998
- Subjectivity and certainty in epistemic modality: A study of Dutch epistemic modifiersCognitive Linguistics, 1996
- The logic of social exchange: Has natural selection shaped how humans reason? Studies with the Wason selection taskCognition, 1989
- Evidentiality and Epistemic SpaceStudies in Language, 1982