Partisan Stereotyping and Polarization in Brazil
Open Access
- 15 December 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Latin American Politics and Society
- Vol. 66 (2) , 47-71
Abstract
In recent decades, Brazilian voters have grown polarized between supporters of the Partido dos Trabalhadores (Workers’ Party, PT), known as petistas, and its opponents, known as antipetistas. What explains this animosity? One potential source of polarization is partisan stereotyping, a tendency for partisans to misperceive the social composition of both their own side’s bases of support as well as their opponents’. We show that most Brazilians overestimate the extent to which petistas and antipetistas belong to party-stereotypical groups such as Afro-Brazilians, evangelical Christians, or poor or rich people. We then show that stereotyping is associated with polarization: the greater the bias in perceived partisan group composition, the greater the perceptions of partisan political extremism and feelings of social distance toward the partisan out-group.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions about Party Composition and Their ConsequencesThe Journal of Politics, 2018
- Political Partisanship as a Social Identity2017
- Social Exclusion and Political Identity: The Case of Asian American PartisanshipThe Journal of Politics, 2017
- (Mis)perceptions of Partisan Polarization in the American PublicPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2015
- Exploring the Bases of Partisanship in the American Electorate: Social Identity vs. IdeologyPolitical Research Quarterly, 2006
- Social Context and Campaign Volatility in New Democracies: Networks and Neighborhoods in Brazil's 2002 ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2006
- Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and ContagionPersonality and Social Psychology Review, 2001
- Incentives to Cultivate a Party Vote in Candidate-centric Electoral SystemsComparative Political Studies, 1999
- Impersonal Influence1998
- Subjective probability: A judgment of representativenessCognitive Psychology, 1972