Peri-Procedural Safety of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Elective Endoscopy: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Background and Aims: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) delay gastric emptying, raising concerns about periprocedural safety in elective endoscopy. We aimed to evaluate the association between pre-procedural GLP-1 RA use and post-procedural complications such as aspiration pneumonia. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, adults (18–89 years) undergoing outpatient esophagogastroduodenoscopy or colonoscopy within the HCA Healthcare network from 1 July 2021 to 31 March 2024 were identified. Patients were classified as GLP-1 RA users (n = 953) or non-users (n = 3289) based on home medication records. Primary outcomes included aspiration, post-procedural oxygen requirement, hypotension, hospitalization, ICU admission, length of stay, and all-cause inpatient mortality. Multivariable logistic and negative-binomial regression models, incorporating an interaction term for anesthesia type, were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, ASA class, and key comorbidities. Results: No aspiration events were reported in either group. GLP-1 RA use was associated with lower odds of post-procedural oxygen requirement (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.25–0.76), hospitalization (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.39–1.36), and mortality (0.1 vs. 0.9%, p = 0.014), and a shorter hospital stay (IRR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40–0.71). Rates of hypotension and ICU admission were similar between both groups. In anesthesia-stratified analysis among GLP-1 RA users, those receiving MAC/MS had higher odds of hospitalization compared with GA (OR 1.87, 95% CI 1.23–2.85, p = 0.003), whereas other outcomes were not significant. Conclusions: Pre-procedural GLP-1 RA therapy was not associated with increased peri-procedural complications. Although hospitalization was more frequent with MAC/MS, this difference did not extend to other clinically significant outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to clarify the clinical implications of anesthesia choice.

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit: