Who Wants to Have an AI Therapist? Acceptance of Using Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health Interventions Among Clinicians, Patients and the General Community
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 23 January 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
- Vol. 33 (1) , e70220
Abstract
The integration of AI‐based digital technologies in mental healthcare represents a transformative shift, especially with regard to chatbots and avatar‐based interventions. A central component of the success of AI‐based digital mental health interventions has to do with the level of acceptance of this new technology: the degree to which stakeholders perceive a technology as useful, user‐friendly and worth adopting. We aimed to establish the level of acceptance of AI‐based digital mental health interventions (AI chatbot, AI avatar‐based interventions) compared with the acceptance levels of teletherapy via videoconferencing among clinicians, patients and a representative community sample (i.e., potential future patients). We also explored the extent to which these differences towards these technologies might be explained by individuals' attitudes towards AI in general. Clinicians ( N = 658), patients ( N = 451) and US census–based community sample ( N = 520) completed standardised measures of everyday artificial intelligence use, general attitudes towards AI and acceptability of digital technology use for mental health interventions. We found that community participants are most optimistic about AI‐based mental health tools (chatbots and avatars), whereas clinicians consistently express more scepticism, especially regarding usability. In our sample, general attitudes towards AI (both positive and negative) were highly associated with acceptance of chatbot and avatar‐based interventions, more than their professional role or demographic identity. These findings might carry clinical implications for the design, deployment and integration of these technologies into mental health services.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mental Health Care Goes Online: Practitioners' Experiences of Providing Mental Health Care During the COVID-19 PandemicCyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 2020
- Effectiveness and Safety of Using Chatbots to Improve Mental Health: Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2020
- Stretching the Analytic Frame: Analytic Therapists’ Experiences with Remote Therapy During COVID-19Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2020
- Stigma, biomarkers, and algorithmic bias: recommendations for precision behavioral health with artificial intelligenceJAMIA Open, 2020
- Artificial Intelligence for Mental Health and Mental Illnesses: an OverviewCurrent Psychiatry Reports, 2019
- Social Robots for People with Aging and Dementia: A Systematic Review of LiteratureTelemedicine and e-Health, 2019
- Chatbots and Conversational Agents in Mental Health: A Review of the Psychiatric LandscapeThe Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 2019
- Conversational agents in healthcare: a systematic reviewJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2018
- AVATAR therapy for auditory verbal hallucinations in people with psychosis: a single-blind, randomised controlled trialThe Lancet Psychiatry, 2018
- Three Problems With Current Digital Mental Health Research . . . and Three Things We Can Do About ThemPsychiatric Services, 2017