Seeking consistency with paired comparisons: a systems approach
Open Access
- 27 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Theory and Decision
- Vol. 91 (3) , 377-402
Abstract
It is well known that decision methods based on pairwise rankings can suffer from a wide range of difficulties. These problems are addressed here by treating the methods as systems, where each pair is looked upon as a subsystem with an assigned task. In this manner, the source of several difficulties (including Arrow’s Theorem) is equated with the standard concern that the “whole need not be the sum of its parts.” These problems arise because the objectives assigned to subsystems need not be compatible with that of the system. Knowing what causes the difficulties leads to resolutions.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Science Foundation (CMMI-1923164)
- University of California, Irvine
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mathematics Motivated by the Social and Behavioral Sciences2018
- A New Way to Analyze Paired Comparison RulesMathematics of Operations Research, 2014
- Symmetry of Nonparametric Statistical Tests on Three SamplesJournal of Mathematics and Statistics, 2010
- A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio-scale matricesEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1993
- The geometric mean procedure for estimating the scale of a judgement matrixMathematical Modelling, 1987
- A note on the analysis of subjective judgment matricesJournal of Mathematical Psychology, 1985