Monitoring the effects of forestry on streams: Variable selection and the development of an expert system
Authors:
- 1 March 1996
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
- Vol. 40 (1) , 55-73
Abstract
An expert system, PASSSFA, has been developed to help select the most appropriate variables for monitoring the effects of extensive land use activities, particularly forestry, on streams. PASSSFA was initially developed for headwater streams in the northwestern U.S. and Alaska, but the consistency of the underlying principles make it much more broadly applicable. The selection process is based on the designated beneficial uses of concern, the type of management activity, accessibility during high flows, frequency of sampling, and the costs for equipment, data collection, and sample analysis. A total of thirty potential monitoring variables are considered, and these were selected because of their sensitivity to land management activities and their effects on key designated uses. Problems in developing PASSSFA and the use of expert systems are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consideration of Watersheds in Long-Term Forest Planning Models: The Case of FORPLAN and Its Use on the National Forests1992
- An Expert System for the Biological Monitoring of River Pollution1992
- Natural Resource Land Management Planning Using Large-Scale Linear Programs: The USDA Forest Service Experience with FORPLANOperations Research, 1991
- Contributions of Computational Hydraulics to the Foundation of a Computational Hydrology1991
- Calibration of SWMM Runoff Quality Model with Expert SystemJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 1990
- An expert system for the selection of a suitable method for flow measurement in open channelsJournal of Hydrology, 1990
- Changing ideas in hydrology — The case of physically-based modelsJournal of Hydrology, 1989
- Ecological considerations in the development and application of instream flow‐habitat modelsRegulated Rivers: Research & Management, 1987
- How do expert systems differ from conventional programs?*Expert Systems, 1986
- Methods for evaluating stream, riparian, and biotic conditions1983