Pupillometric and behavioural evidence shows no differences between polyseme and homonym processing
Authors:
Open Access
- 13 July 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Acta Psychologica
- Vol. 238, 103985
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (PID2019-107206GB-I00, RED2018-102615-T)
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
- Universitat Rovira i Virgili (2018PFR-URV-B2-32)
- Gobierno de Aragón (UZ-DGA-H11-17R)
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación (FFI2017-82460-P)
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effectsPsychophysiology, 2011
- The relatedness-of-meaning effect for ambiguous words in lexical-decision tasks: When does relatedness matter?Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 2010
- Wuggy: A multilingual pseudoword generatorBehavior Research Methods, 2010
- Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and itemsJournal of Memory and Language, 2008
- Pupillary responses during lexical decisions vary with word frequency but not emotional valenceInternational Journal of Psychophysiology, 2007
- Ambiguity and relatedness effects in semantic tasks: Are they due to semantic coding?Journal of Memory and Language, 2006
- The effects of homonymy and polysemy on lexical access: an MEG studyCognitive Brain Research, 2005
- Modelling the effects of semantic ambiguity in word recognitionCognitive Science, 2004
- Making Sense of Semantic Ambiguity: Semantic Competition in Lexical AccessJournal of Memory and Language, 2002
- Multiple meanings, number of related meanings, frequency of occurrence, and the lexiconCognitive Psychology, 1981