Subject NP doubling, matching, and minority French
Author:
- 1 March 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Language Variation and Change
- Vol. 7 (1) , 1-14
Abstract
Our study presents a variationist analysis of subject doubling in the French of Ontario, Canada. Two principal variants are distinguished: a non-doubled variant and a doubled variant containing a clitic agreement marker. In our analyses, both linguistic and social factors are taken into account and analyzed usinggoldvarb2. It is proposed that subject clitics are marked for default features, and that the doubled variant is favored when the clitic's default features match those of the subject NP; lack of matching favors the non-doubled variant. Discussion of linguistic factors for the present study, therefore, is limited to those factors which can be explained in terms matching. The principal social factor studied is restricted language use (cf. Mougeon & Beniak, 1991). Our results show that the greater the restriction, the fewer doubled subjects one finds.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the Source of Lefthand NPs in French1997
- On Definiteness1991
- Linguistic Consequences of Language Contact and Restriction1991
- Topic Islands and the Subjacency ParameterCanadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique, 1989
- The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructionsNatural Language & Linguistic Theory, 1988
- The syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics of left- and right-dislocations in FrenchLingua, 1988
- An Empirical Study of the Syntax and Pragmatics of Left Dislocations in Spoken French1986
- The Pragmatics of Left Detachment in Spoken Standard French1985
- Topic, Antitopic and Verb Agreement in Non-Standard French1981
- Definites in There -SentencesLanguage, 1978