Twitter and elections: are tweets, predictive, reactive, or a form of buzz?

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:

• Affective News: The Automated Coding of Sentiment in Political Texts
  Political Communication, 2012
• The Tea Party Movement, Framing, and the US Media
  Social Movement Studies, 2011
• Playing with politics: Political fans and Twitter faking in post-broadcast democracy
  Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 2011
• Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning
  Party Politics, 2011
• Why the Pirate Party Won the German Election of 2009 or The Trouble With Predictions: A Response to Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T. O., Sander, P. G., & Welpe, I. M. “Predicting Elections With Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal About Political Sentiment”
  Social Science Computer Review, 2011
• From Networked Nominee to Networked Nation: Examining the Impact of Web 2.0 and Social Media on Political Participation and Civic Engagement in the 2008 Obama Campaign
  Journal of Political Marketing, 2011
• Election Forecasts With Twitter
  Social Science Computer Review, 2010
• Twitter
  Social Science Computer Review, 2010
• Sociology of Hyperlink Networks of Web 1.0, Web 2.0, and Twitter: A Case Study of South Korea
  Social Science Computer Review, 2010
• Gone viral? Heard the buzz? A guide for public health practitioners and researchers on how Web 2.0 can subvert advertising restrictions and spread health information: Table 1
  Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2008