The Tenuous Nature Of The Medicaid Entitlement
Authors:
- Richard C. LindroothRLRichard C. Lindrooth
- Marcelo C. PerraillonMPMarcelo C. Perraillon
- Rose Y. HardyRHRose Y. Hardy
- Gregory J. TungGTGregory J. Tung
- Micah HartmanMHMicah Hartman
- Anne B. MartinAMAnne B. Martin
- Nathan EspinosaNENathan Espinosa
- Aaron CatlinACAaron Catlin
- The National Health Expenditure Accounts TeamTTThe National Health Expenditure Accounts Team
- Olena MazurenkoOMOlena Mazurenko
- Casey P. BalioCBCasey P. Balio
Open Access
- 1 January 2003
- journal article
- other
- Published by Health Affairs Publishing, LLC in Health Affairs
- Vol. 22 (1) , 145-153
Abstract
Although Medicaid is regarded as a federal entitlement program, nowhere does the Medicaid statute explicitly recognize a federal right of action to enforce recipients' rights. Arguably, the Supreme Court, rather than Congress, first recognized the right of Medicaid recipients to protection of federal law. A controversial 2001 federal court decision, however, called into question the continuing existence of federally enforceable Medicaid rights. Although this decision has been reversed, it illuminates the tenuous nature of the Medicaid entitlement, as do recent Supreme Court decisions narrowing federal rights. Congress should amend the Medicaid statute to ensure the rights of Medicaid recipients.Keywords
This publication has 1 reference indexed in Scilit:
- Federal Judicial Review of State Welfare PracticesColumbia Law Review, 1967