Why does primary care need more implementation research?
Authors:
- Robbie FoyRFRobbie Foy
- Martin EcclesMEMartin Eccles
- Jeremy GrimshawJGJeremy Grimshaw
Open Access
- 1 August 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Family Practice
- Vol. 18 (4) , 353-355
Abstract
Foy R, Eccles M and Grimshaw J. Why does primary care need more implementation research? Family Practice 2001; 18: 353–355.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why do GPs not implement evidence-based guidelines? A descriptive studyFamily Practice, 2001
- Promoting evidence-based medicine in general practice--the impact of academic detailingFamily Practice, 2001
- Lipid concentrations and the use of lipid lowering drugs: evidence from a national cross sectional surveyBMJ, 2000
- Are clinical practice guidelines valid for primary care?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2000
- Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchersInternational Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2000
- Primary care research: ends and means.Family Practice, 2000
- Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational studyBMJ, 1998
- Secondary prevention in coronary heart disease: baseline survey of provision in general practiceBMJ, 1998
- In This IssueThe Milbank Quarterly, 1998
- Preventive care for patients following myocardial infarction. The Wessex Research Network (WReN)Family Practice, 1997