Evaluation of the efficacy of a medium cut-off dialyser and comparison with other high-flux dialysers in conventional haemodialysis and online haemodiafiltration
Open Access
- 26 February 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Kidney Journal
- Vol. 11 (5) , 742-746
Abstract
Online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) has been shown to reduce all-cause mortality versus conventional haemodialysis (HD); however, it is not always available. In these situations, a novel class of membranes with a higher pore size, medium cut-off (MCO) dialysers, could be promising. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of an MCO dialyser in the removal of small and medium-size molecules and compare it with standard high-flux (HF) dialysers in HD and OL-HDF. In this crossover study, 18 prevalent HD patients were studied in three single mid-week dialysis treatments during three consecutive weeks as follows: first week with OL-HDF with a standard HF dialyser, second week with conventional HD with a standard HF dialyser and third week with conventional HD with an MCO dialyser. Reduction ratios (RRs) of different-sized molecules and albumin losses were collected for the different dialysers. MCO HD provided a greater reduction of middle and larger middle molecules compared with standard HF HD [rate reduction (RR) β2-microglobulin 74.7% versus 69.7%, P=0.01; RR myoglobin 62.5% versus 34.3%, P=0.001; RR prolactin 60% versus 32.8%, P=0.001; RR α1-glycoprotein 2.8% versus −0.1%, P=0.01]. We found no difference in the clearance of small and larger middle molecules comparing MCO HD with OL-HDF. Albumin losses were 0.03 g/session with MCO HD and 3.1 g/session with OL-HDF (P=0.001). MCO HD is superior to standard HF HD in the removal of middle and larger middle molecules and it is not inferior to OL-HDF in the clearance of small and larger middle molecules. Thus it could be an alternative in patients in which it is not possible to perform OL-HDF.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is High‐Volume Online Hemodiafiltration Associated With Malnutrition?Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, 2017
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of online hemodiafiltration versus high-flux hemodialysisClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research, 2016
- Future Avenues to Decrease Uremic Toxin ConcentrationAmerican Journal of Kidney Diseases, 2016
- MCO Membranes: Enhanced Selectivity in High-Flux ClassScientific Reports, 2015
- Albumin Leakage in Online Hemodiafiltration, More Convective Transport, More Losses?Therapeutic Apheresis and Dialysis, 2014
- High-Efficiency Postdilution Online Hemodiafiltration Reduces All-Cause Mortality in Hemodialysis PatientsJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2013
- Mortality and cardiovascular events in online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) compared with high-flux dialysis: results from the Turkish OL-HDF StudyNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2012
- Effect of Membrane Permeability on Survival of Hemodialysis PatientsJournal of the American Society of Nephrology, 2009
- Chronic inflammation and mortality in haemodialysis: effect of different renal replacement therapies. Results from the RISCAVID studyNephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 2008
- Mortality risk for patients receiving hemodiafiltration versus hemodialysis: European results from the DOPPSKidney International, 2006