The influence of group values and behavior on adolescent male perceptions of and use of homophobic language
- 11 September 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Adolescence
- Vol. 69 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Introduction: The pervasive and derogatory use of homophobic language is a threat to safe, respectful, and inclusive school environments. Group membership has been shown to influence how students use homophobic language. Previous qualitative studies have largely approached the use of this language from the theoretical framework of hegemonic masculinity. In contrast, the current study actively challenged all assumptions about the use of this language.Method: This study was conducted in a public high school located in a rural conservative Christian community in the Intermountain West (USA). Using hermeneutic qualitative methodology to assess individual perceptions of homophobic language, 20 randomly selected 12th‐grade male students (17–18 years of age) were individually interviewed.Results: Three distinct groups emerged during our interviews: students on the debate team, students who strongly identified with a conservative religion, and students on popular athletic teams. Membership in specific peer groups influenced how students participated in or abstained from using homophobic language. Contrary to the prevailing research that pairs religiosity with negatively biased attitudes toward LGBTQIA, in this study, participants' religious beliefs appeared to be associated with respecting others' feelings and a decreased likelihood of using homophobic language.Conclusions: After summarizing this study's findings, we conclude with implications for practice. To more effectively deter the use of homophobic language, we encourage school‐based interventions that target specific groups of adolescents and consider the social context in which homophobic language occurs.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- It’s not a joke: Masculinity ideology and homophobic language.Psychology of Men & Masculinities, 2017
- Who intervenes against homophobic behavior? Attributes that distinguish active bystandersJournal of School Psychology, 2016
- Leveraging school-based research to inform bullying prevention and policy.American Psychologist, 2016
- Long-term adult outcomes of peer victimization in childhood and adolescence: Pathways to adjustment and maladjustment.American Psychologist, 2015
- A relational framework for understanding bullying: Developmental antecedents and outcomes.American Psychologist, 2015
- How Peers Make a Difference: The Role of Peer Groups and Peer Relationships in Personality DevelopmentEuropean Journal of Personality, 2014
- Predicting Homophobic Behavior Among Heterosexual Youth: Domain General and Sexual Orientation-Specific Factors at the Individual and Contextual LevelJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 2012
- Changes in how students use and are called homophobic epithets over time: Patterns predicted by gender, bullying, and victimization status.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2012
- Intergroup Contact and Beliefs about Homosexuality in AdolescenceJournal of Youth and Adolescence, 2009
- Peer-led intervention campaign against school bullying: who considered it useful, who benefited?Educational Research, 2001