After automation: Homelessness prioritization algorithms and the future of care labor
Open Access
- 21 March 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Big Data & Society
- Vol. 11 (1)
Abstract
People experiencing homelessness seek support from homeless services systems that increasingly rely on prioritization algorithms to determine who is the most deserving of scarce resources. In this paper, we argue that algorithmic harms in homeless services require a reparative approach that takes the data work of care workers seriously. Building on Davis, Williams, and Yang's concept of algorithmic reparation, we present a qualitative study that examines the intertwining of data work and care labor of 15 care workers. We show how they wrestle with the ethics of algorithmic prioritization and develop workarounds that allow them to advocate for their clients. We contribute an empirical understanding of how care workers provide care under homeless services systems that equate data work with care labor to justify work intensification. Our findings have implications for understanding the future of care labor in datafied conditions and the social and political ramifications of algorithmically mediated care.Keywords
Funding Information
- Google Research (This work was funded by a Google Inclusion Researc)
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recordkeeping, logistics, and translation: a study of homeless services systems as infrastructureArchival Science, 2023
- Coordinated Access and Coordinated Entry System Processes in the Housing and Homelessness Sector: A Critical Commentary on Current PracticesHousing Policy Debate, 2022
- Just Infrastructure? Field Research on a Standardized Assessment Tool for a Continuum of Care for People Experiencing HomelessnessProceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2021
- Invisible intersectionality in measuring vulnerability among individuals experiencing homelessness – critically appraising the VI-SPDATJournal of Social Distress and Homelessness, 2020
- The homeless Coordinated Entry System: the VI-SPDAT and other predictors of establishing eligibility for services for single homeless adultsJournal of Social Distress and Homelessness, 2019
- Fairness and Abstraction in Sociotechnical Systems2019
- Engaging Solidarity in Data Collection Practices for Community HealthProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2018
- Reliability and validity of the Vulnerability Index-Service Prioritization Decision Assistance Tool (VI-SPDAT) in real-world implementationJournal of Social Distress and Homelessness, 2018
- From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional ControlPublic Administration Review, 2002
- Making work visibleCommunications of the ACM, 1995