Thailand's Department of Agricultural Extension and Agrochemical Dependency: Perspectives on Contributing Factors and Mitigation Strategies
Authors:
- 13 May 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension
- Vol. 22 (3) , 225-240
Abstract
Purpose: This paper discusses theoretical, policy and practical issues concerning the problem of ‘agrochemical dependency’ in Thailand, including roles that public extension services play in advocacy or mitigation of agrochemical use.Methodology/Approach: Our research aimed to better understand department of agricultural extension (DOAE) institutional and officials’ perceptions of contributing factors to agrochemical dependency as well as strategies for mitigating agrochemical use. We reviewed relevant policies, web materials and technical cooperation agreements. We supplemented theoretical and document analysis with interviews totalling15 DOAE managers or senior officers comparing Bangkok headquarters and Nan Province perspectives. We refer to relevant secondary literatures for explanatory context.Findings: Results showed differences as well as similarities between views of DOAE officials in Bangkok headquarters and those from one province (Nan) about DOAE priorities, responsibilities and perceived reasons why farmers overuse agrochemicals or do not adopt organic agriculture (OA). A national policy encouraged ‘safe use’ of agrochemicals but not (necessarily or effectively) mitigation while the DOAE still (to a much lesser extent) promoted self-sufficiency and OA alternatives. Interviews and documentary evidence revealed DOAE public–private partnerships with corporate advice, technical support, human resources and learning activities that encouraged or normalized agrochemical use and dependency.Practical Implications: Study results should be useful for governments, donors, international agencies and department officials in policy development, program planning, training design, budgeting and delivery.Originality/Value: This study is unique for: better understanding implications of agrochemical dependency and privatization of public extension services; analyzing factors inhibiting OA adoption; and examining contentious policies, partnerships, and training activities.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can a public GAP approach ensure safetyandfairness? A comparative study of Q-GAP in ThailandThe Journal of Peasant Studies, 2013
- Can public GAP standards reduce agricultural pesticide use? The case of fruit and vegetable farming in northern ThailandAgriculture and Human Values, 2012
- What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-based interview studiesPsychology & Health, 2010
- Pesticide Use and Prevention Practices of Tangerine Growers in Northern ThailandThe Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2009
- How Many Interviews Are Enough?Field Methods, 2006
- Agricultural Extension: Good Intentions and Hard RealitiesThe World Bank Research Observer, 2004
- Extension system reform and the challenges aheadThe Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 2004
- Reducing food poverty by increasing agricultural sustainability in developing countriesAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2003
- Why farmers continue to use pesticides despite environmental, health and sustainability costsEcological Economics, 2001
- Learning: Shifting paradigms in education and extension studiesThe Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 1998