Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Intracochlear and Intralabyrinthine Schwannomas
Authors:
- Brian A. NeffBNBrian A. Neff
- Douglas P. SladenDSDouglas P. Sladen
- Michael J. LinkMLMichael J. Link
- Colin L. DriscollCDColin L. Driscoll
- 1 July 2016
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Otology & Neurotology
- Vol. 37 (6) , 647-653
Abstract
Schwannomas may arise primarily within the inner ear, or invade the cochlea or labyrinth from the distal internal auditory canal through transmodiolar or transmacular extension, respectively. To date, very limited data exists regarding cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in this unique population. Retrospective case review. Ten ears (nine patients) with inner ear schwannomas that underwent CI at a single tertiary referral center. Cochlear implantation. Surgical approach, CI performance. Ten ears (nine patients) were implanted with conventional CI arrays. Three cases had primary inner ear schwannomas, while seven were in patients with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) having transmodiolar invasion of the inner ear from a vestibular schwannoma (VS). In all cases, intracochlear tumor was left in situ to preserve cochlear anatomy and a full electrode insertion was achieved. Use of a styleted electrode with late deployment aided advancement through the intracochlear tumor. In all cases, the ipsilateral internal auditory canal and inner ear could be visualized on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for tumor surveillance. Eight ears achieved good open-set word recognition (median, Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant [CNC] 50% [range, 28-88%], median, AzBio 73% [range, 60-91%]); two patients with NF2 and prolonged deafness (15 and 22 years) received limited benefit. Cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear schwannomas and an intact cochlear nerve is feasible. Leaving intracochlear schwannoma in situ preserves cochlear architecture and use of a styleted electrode may aid in achieving a full insertion when obstructing tumor is present. Postoperative MRI surveillance is still adequate after CI and a high percentage of patients achieve good open-set speech perception performance.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Superficial SiderosisOtology & Neurotology, 2015
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cochlear Implant Magnet in PlaceOtology & Neurotology, 2015
- Evidence of polyclonality in neurofibromatosis type 2–associated multilobulated vestibular schwannomasNeuro-Oncology, 2014
- Primary inner ear schwannomas: A case series and systematic review of the literatureThe Laryngoscope, 2013
- Cochlear Implantation in Patients With Neurofibromatosis Type 2Otology & Neurotology, 2012
- Cochlear Implantation in Children with Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: Long-Term OutcomesJournal of the American Academy of Audiology, 2012
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 T After Cochlear ImplantationOtology & Neurotology, 2010
- Diagnosis and Management of Intracochlear SchwannomasOtology & Neurotology, 2007
- Intralabyrinthine Schwannomas: Diagnosis, Management, and a New Classification SystemOtology & Neurotology, 2004
- Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines for the evaluation of hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma (vestibular schwannoma)∗Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, 1995