Revenue sharing among ISPs in two-sided markets
Authors:
- 1 April 2011
- conference paper
- Published by Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE)
- p. 596-600
Abstract
In this paper, we study the revenue sharing and rate allocation for Internet Service Providers (ISPs) that jointly provide network connectivity between content providers and end-users. Without colluding, each ISP may selfishly set a high transit-price to cover its cost and maximize its own profit, which inevitably results in a loss in social profit. We model this noncooperative interaction between an “eyeball” ISP and a “content” ISP as a Stackelberg game and quantify the resulting loss in social profit. To recover the profit loss, we propose a revenue sharing contract between ISPs by modeling them as a supply chain to deliver traffic in a two-sided market. Parameterized by the profit division factor, the sharing contract coordinates ISPs' objectives such that they aim to maximize the social profit self-incentively. We further propose a Nash bargaining process to determine the profit division factor such that all ISPs are simultaneously better off compared to the noncooperative equilibrium.Keywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Revenue sharing among ISPs in two-sided markets2011
- Network Pricing and Rate Allocation with Content Provider Participation2009
- Interconnecting eyeballs to content2008
- A game–theoretic analysis of the implications of overlay network traffic on ISP peeringComputer Networks, 2008
- Interaction of ISPs: Distributed Resource Allocation and Revenue MaximizationIEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2008
- Economics of Network Pricing With Multiple ISPsIEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2006
- Pricing and revenue sharing strategies for internet service providers2005
- Supply Chain Coordination with Revenue-Sharing Contracts: Strengths and LimitationsManagement Science, 2005
- The Nash Bargaining Solution in Economic ModellingThe RAND Journal of Economics, 1986