Evaluation of empirical and mechanistic models and sampling intervals to model the lactation curves of F1 dairy sheep
Authors:
- Lilian GuevaraLilian Guevara
- Nicolas Lopez-VillalobosNicolas Lopez-Villalobos
- Geoffrey Ernest PollottGeoffrey Ernest Pollott
- Benito Albarrán-PortilloBenito Albarrán-Portillo
- Alberto Magno FernandesAlberto Magno Fernandes
- Jesús Armando Salinas-MartínezJesús Armando Salinas-Martínez
- Juan Carlos Angeles-HernandezJuan Carlos Angeles-Hernandez
Open Access
- 14 March 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Tropical Animal Health and Production
- Vol. 57 (2) , 1-12
Abstract
Recently Latin American countries have developed a dairy sheep industry with an increasing number of specialized dairy-sheep flocks. The objective of this study was to evaluate the goodness of fit of empirical and mechanistic models and sampling interval to model the lactation curve of F1 dairy sheep with different shape of lactation curves in an intensively managed flock of the central highlands of Mexico. A total of 4,494 weekly (7D) test day records (TDR) from 156 lactations were analyzed. Three datasets were generated from the original 7D data set, setting TDR at different sampling intervals: 14 (14D), 21 (21D) and 28 (28D) days. Lactation curves were fitted using two empirical (Wood and Wilmink) and two mechanistic models (Dijkstra and Pollott). The parameters of the empirical and mechanistic models were estimated using the iterative non-linear curve fitting procedure in R. The results showed that the estimation of TMY was not affected by the sampling interval. However, the estimation of peak yield (PY) and day at peak yield (TPY) was affected by sampling interval (P < 0.05), with better estimates for 7D and 14D. Estimates of PY and TPY differed between the empirical and mechanistic models with both methods failing to estimate PY and TPY in atypical curves. The Dijkstra model showed the best fit for typical curves and the Pollott model for atypical curves in all the sampling intervals evaluated.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Suitability of simplified methods for monthly and twice-monthly milk recording, and new prediction factors for the alternate a.m./p.m. method in dairy ewes under a low-input production systemJournal of Dairy Research, 2007
- The Accuracy of Seven Mathematical Functions in Modeling Dairy Cattle Lactation Curves Based on Test-Day Records From Varying Sample SchemesJournal of Dairy Science, 2006
- Detection of Different Shapes of Lactation Curve for Milk Yield in Dairy Cattle by Empirical Mathematical ModelsJournal of Dairy Science, 2005
- Deconstructing Milk Yield and Composition During Lactation Using Biologically Based Lactation ModelsJournal of Dairy Science, 2004
- AIC model selection using Akaike weightsPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2004
- Assessing the (a)symmetry of concentration-effect curvesPharmacology & Therapeutics, 2002
- Mediterranean dairy sheep and goat products and their qualitySmall Ruminant Research, 2001
- A Biological Approach to Lactation Curve Analysis for Milk YieldJournal of Dairy Science, 2000
- Lactation Curves of Valle del Belice Dairy Ewes for Yields of Milk, Fat, and Protein Estimated with Test Day ModelsJournal of Dairy Science, 1997
- Multiple-Trait Prediction of Lactation Yields for Dairy CowsJournal of Dairy Science, 1996