POINT: Prosthesis–patient mismatch does not affect survival for patients greater than 70 years of age undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement

This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:

• Patient prosthesis mismatch affects short- and long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement☆
  European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2006
• Patient-prosthesis mismatch does not affect survival following aortic valve replacement☆
  European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2006
• Prosthesis–patient mismatch and clinical outcomes: The evidence continues to accumulate
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006
• Prosthesis–patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement predominantly affects patients with preexisting left ventricular dysfunction: Effect on survival, freedom from heart failure, and left ventricular mass regression
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2006
• Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch After Aortic Valve Replacement: Impact of Age and Body Size on Late Survival
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2006
• Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2004
• Prosthesis size and long-term survival after aortic valve replacement
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2003
• Impact of Valve Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch on Short-Term Mortality After Aortic Valve Replacement
  Circulation, 2003
• Eleven years' experience with the Biocor stentless aortic bioprosthesis: clinical and hemodynamic follow-up with long-term relative survival rate.
  European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2002
• Aortic valve replacement: Is valve size important?
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2000